I have an issue with not allowing juries to use reality in their decisions. For example, telling them not to consider that Jason didn't speak to police, and not allowing the 911 call audio to be included in evidence in its entirety. It's reality. How can you arrive at the truth if you don't consider reality? Yes, I know, this is legal justice and not necessarily the truth.
I hope this jury is able to broadly construe instructions and evidence and not just acquiesce to a piece of a jury instruction so they don't have to make a hard decision. IMO, that's what happened in the Anthony trial.
Don't get me wrong, I do love America and appreciate it. When living abroad for a few years, I wanted to kiss the ground at Logan airport every time I came back for a visit.
But I take issue when jury ends up saying "yeah, we all think s/he did it, but the {insert legal technicality here}said we couldn't find him/her guilty". Something is wrong when that happens. It's like everyone admiring the emperor's new clothes. Reality is otherwise.
/rant over