Can we discuss the defense opening statements here? I guess during opening statements, no one is allowed to yell, "Objection!"
Specifically at 6:00 of this video:
https://www.courttv.com/title/10-10-19-fl-v-rodgers-defense-opening-statement/
"We will hear that Mr. Rogers was her protector, in terms of physically, financially and emotionally.
Until, she hooked up with the police. That the police convinced her that Mr. Rogers was guilty of this and that he would be put to death."
I think the wording
"she hooked up with the police" doesn't sound very nice or is an educated way of stating she was interviewed by police. To me, it doesn't matter how he "provided for her" when she was later told, by JRR, that he killed Teresa with a hammer. As a matter-of-fact (IMO) it gives me less reason to believe she "hooked up" with anybody as her loyalties were to JRR up and until the time he told her what he did. (IMO, the defense had very little sizzle and a whole lot of fizzle.)
Heck, maybe the police even told TaySho she was in danger. And, if they did....bless them, because she probably was in danger! CWW was already trying to pry information out of her. Her "protector" was using her to dispose of evidence....yep, she was in danger. She knew JRR and CWW had gone to Florida and that MS's wife was killed at the same time they were in Florida!
I can think of at least 8 family members, spouses, employers and friends who knew CWW & JRR were going to Florida....heck, the only thing they didn't do was post it on a billboard in the center of town!