There has to be some legitimacy to this call, otherwise how would this person have Sara's phone number? If the Sara is indeed telling the truth, the caller would have needed access to Maureen's phone to get the phone number. Further, this caller would have needed to have some relationship with Maureen, rather than just seeing her at a whorehouse. He would have needed to know the friendship between Sara and Maureen. I suppose he could have had Maureen's phone and randomly picked a name in her contacts and called, but more likely, he spent time talking to Maureen and got her to open up. Which, as with the other victims, is a major part of his signature. We also need to know what else was said during this conversation. Lastly, did Kolker purposely leave this information out in his book, and if so, why? Or did Sara not reveal it to him for some reason, which would be odd, because she was presumably interviewed at length by Kolker, and Kolker is very good at his job.
