I understand now. Thank you!
I returned today after a 10 day (disconnected) vacation with hopes that LE had released the cause and manner of death. After scrolling (quickly) through 10 days of this thread I'm disappointed to see that we don't appear to know that cause and manner of death? Or did I overlook an important message?
No new information has been released by officials, but we have been joined by an insider who has been very helpful with our understanding of the information that has been released.
Re: the property south of the culvert...
Back in thread 2(?) after the body was discovered, I posted about this house. I think it is a stand-alone house as apposed to a condo because I found a recent property listing. Google/Bing ground level 'street views' showed the place looking a bit neglected so I asked locals if they knew it to be vacant? If the killer was from the area and knew of the culvert and that there were no close potential witnesses to the scene, well, to me, that indicates a degree of forethought.
As a side thought to this as I don't think it has been suggested: what if Cheryl did suicide but out of protection of her loved ones (and how she was remembered), she did not want it known. That would involve setting up circumstances and locations that point away from suicide, and no witnesses. If suicide is still on the table, this is one of the few versions of it that work in my head.
I agree but also think it indicates it wasn't planned. The place seems like the choice of someone a little panicky and not the choice of a planned murder.
True, even their work includes, scoping out their next victim...I agree and it was a place they could hide her and be on their way because they had to be at work.
Whomever it was...
True, even their work includes, scoping out their next victim...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
Have I missed something? Is definitive information available which directly points to these conclusions? Please share!To me this was personal!
No other victim!
Hi, why do you think this was personal? I can't see what evidence leads to that conclusion?
I think this was a crazy random event that happened early on a Monday morning to a woman who was just doing her normal day to day activities. I also see no evidence supporting the 'personal' theory.
I am inclined to think that Cheryl's car was used in her abduction and murder simply because there was blood on the passenger seat of her car. I don't see her being attacked in her car, and then moved to another vehicle. At the same time, it seems very unlikely that someone could put her body in the culvert during the day without someone seeing something.
Have I missed something? Is definitive information available which directly points to these conclusions? Please share!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
I think this was a crazy random event that happened early on a Monday morning to a woman who was just doing her normal day to day activities. I also see no evidence supporting the 'personal' theory.
I am inclined to think that Cheryl's car was used in her abduction and murder simply because there was blood on the passenger seat of her car. I don't see her being attacked in her car, and then moved to another vehicle. At the same time, it seems very unlikely that someone could put her body in the culvert during the day without someone seeing something.
Unless it was a suicide.JMO folks but a mugger will just leave ya where he hit ya and take off.
And if it was a random crime what crime besides murder was happening here?
It is my opinion its someone she knew!
Hi, why do you think this was personal? I can't see what evidence leads to that conclusion?
I don't believe suicide at all!!!!
My thoughts continue to be with Cheryl's family. May whoever is responsible to apprehended soon!!!