Please explain, what are the "12:30" posts?
Someone was questioning whether there was any significance to the time that Cheryl's body was found.
Please explain, what are the "12:30" posts?
Is it possible that someone out there maybe did think they saw a woman walking that morning and LE has just not told us? Or has LE stated that there have been no tips of that sort? I can't imagine a woman walking during the commute timeframe standing out, so maybe no one took notice. But do we know for sure that no one did?
When was animal control seen by the creek? As in, it was part of the investigation? Was LE there at the same time?
Lack of evidence pointing to a homicide now, does NOT mean, that a MOTIVE couldnt still aways appear down the road..
It reminds me of when the police have PHYSICAL EVIDENCE on a suspect, but they juuust need to FIGURE out that MOTIVE, so that jury will convict. When EVIDENCE isn't always enough....
No evidence linking a killer now, not 100% of evidence pointing to a suicide, indicates to me, how there still could be a MOTIVE, a strong enough MOTIVE, that required the use of NO weapons, no signs of a violent struggle, and definetly no sneezing.
I think it would be almost necessary to start jotting down things, that connect, or dont, or seem odd (doesnt have to be how I connect something)..just the small pieces that dont fit now somewhere for them, might be what people won't remember later. If you take notes of a lot of small stuff, it might lead to the bigger picture. If her family & those closest to her, strongly think she has a calculated killer, then why not jot down some calculations, as they see fit, relevant or odd to them.
The problem with raw meat being the origin of the animal blood in Cheryl's car is that animals are cleaned after the kill, and that includes removing blood. If the animal blood in her car is from an innocuous source, then that source is not cleaning raw meat properly.
Something is wrong with this picture regardless of whether you lean towards suicide or murder.
We're asking a lot from Cheryl in order to believe this was suicide. We have to believe that she was mentally ill, that she plotted to conceal her intent to commit suicide by pouring animal blood in her car and planting blood (cuts to fingers), that she avoided being seen for 1.5 miles during rush hour, that she chose a polluted creek, and especially a dark culvert, to breath her last breath and see her last memory.
It's not logical, but she was an analyst - who is by nature: logical.
No one said mentally ill. Despondent, depressed, bored, ..... maybe. It doesn't have to be "clinical xxxx".
The cuts to fingers as a distraction/scene staging is NOT a big jump, I've seen far more than that.
The animal blood though, that would be a new one for me.
Walking 1.5 miles, maybe all of that was not as visible, maybe she got to the creek. People don't notice things. We've had plenty of cases where someone SHOULD have seen something and no one called it in. People get scared of being made fun of, or getting involved.
The creek isn't polluted, it might have an excess of fecal coliform but it is quite possible to have that kind of state but not to look all that bad.
The dark culvert could actually be attractive to her. Not as visible from the road, and a dark place might be attractive to slip away.
But these points could also be attractive to a killer, with the exception of the "self inflicted" cuts.
I believe that people who kill themselves are mentally ill.
Even those with a terminal illness who would rather die on their own timeline and escape pain and suffering?
If Cheryl committed suicide in a ditch without prescription drugs and with no history of mental illness, she is a complete standout in the statistics.
Not here, we get many suicides with people that have no history of mental illness, no drugs. I don't know what geographic regions your statistics are for, but suicidal behavior varies a lot by location. Alaska, for example, higher frequency, and more firearm suicides.
If you came to me with a story that you were looking for a person, and we find them with no history of mental illness, and no drugs, I would say totally possible it is suicide. Jilted spouses, failed businesspeople, you name it. Plenty of non mental health reasons why people kill themselves.
I agree. I was walking all around those areas and I doubt anyone (even that afternoon) would have recalled seeing me. I don't think anyone would have necessarily noticed Cheryl walking.
I am with you. I can't claim to know at all whether this was homicide or suicide. But one could also argue that no one noticed Cheryl being forced into a car. Just like if no one noticed her walking, it doesn't mean it didn't happen.
I am not pooh-poohing all the homicide posts, people are making good points. But some, not as much.
We there's a lack of a lot of things pointing to homicide, except for theories.
How so?
Well that is what detectives do. And SAR (when we are asked)