Just looking back at old WW articles and I found this statement...
It (MC's body) was found by someone walking along the beach about 12:45 p.m. Saturday.
At the time,
said Chelan County Sheriff’s Office spokesman Moore,
it appeared the body had been put there by someone
Bolded and underlined by me, what does that mean "at the time"? Like, that is what they thought at first but now they know something different?
Here is the article if anyone would like to take a look.
http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2010/feb/14/investigators-say-body-is-mackenzie-cowell/
"
At the time" LOL If this was really how Moore worded it we should all thank him for another worthless statement.
Trying to read into that statement, SPECULATION, if LE thought the body was PUT at the location they found it, but have since changed their mind, maybe this was because the body was located high on the shoreline? Being so far from the river "water" on that Saturday they assumed it was "put" there as opposed to floating there. Then LE received information that the "river" water level fluctuates and they changed their mind. In fact, it appears the water level was at it's highest point for the entire time MC was missing on the evening of Tuesday the 9th. (Data attached below)
After police figured out that there were times while MC was missing when the water level was likely quite higher off the CB property they decided she could have floated to the spot where she was found - thus the addition of "
At the time" to Moore's statement.
At the time, plausibility for this happening seems rather high, IMO.
-- Continuing with some SPECULATION based on the attachment --
Besides the Tuesday "higher" water level (and possibly even a "surge" on top of that higher water level until almost 10 pm Tuesday night), there also appears to be;
-- Another "higher" water level on Wednesday just after noon which could have lasted a few hours
-- And a couple of shorter periods of only "high" (not "higher") water levels the afternoon of Thursday and mid-morning on Friday.
So, I've attached a picture of the excel chart which didn't save correctly as a jpg - the text moved. (So when reading the text it should be moved to the right and down). Or skip all that and open it in your excel program or viewer by
downloading the chart and spreadsheet with data points.
I compared
the previously posted water elevation level at the south end of the reservoir (Wanapum Dam forebay) to the water elevation level at the north end of the reservoir, (Rock Island Dam Tailwater). I didn't post the tailwater information but it is found at the same large text file as the previous reports were found. Search for "RIS" and then look for the "HT" data set
here.
There are too many factors to do anything but guess how these water level changes below Rock Island Dam would effect the small bay in front of the CB property. Any water "surge" coming from Rock Island Dam would need to travel south down the reservoir 8 miles, hit a 90 degree corner, then travel another 4 miles to the east where
whatever was left of the "surge" would hit another 90 degree corner and AT THE SAME TIME hit the small bay in front of the CB property. Because the property is located at the bend in the river, one might imagine the "surge" would be more evident at this location then just along side a straight shoreline.
Although I've tried, it is extremely difficult to even guesstimate "surge" potential effecting water levels without some "on the ground" measurements at the Crescent Bar property.
ETA: Sorry... just noticed the attached jpg image didn't even save the "legend" text. Please try to
download and open the excel sheet if you really wanna look over this data - (graph is on sheet2, data points are on sheet1). For those looking at the attachment, the red line is the water elevation level as based on measurements at Wanapum Dam forebay starting from 4 pm Tuesday the 9th of Feb. until 2 pm on Saturday the 13th of Feb. The blue line is the water elevation level below Rock Island Dam for the same time period.