Odd that a location within the vehicle is not identified on the property seizure record for from where glass might have been retrieved.
Broken glass is significant, given the condition of the body. I would expect if LE found broken glass in the vehicle that they would detail the exact location, floor driver-side rear, or such, so as to prepare in trial for possible location of perp or body.
That is no minor point.
We know MC's vehicle suffered no broken windows, as we see all windows intact via photos taken in the impound yard.
But, the record does indicate: "from kitchen counter @ home - LOI recovery"
Without microscopic analysis of the makeup and edges of the glass supposedly retrieved from both locations (vehicle and kitchen counter) how might an officer identify a match of the pieces with such certainty on a seizure report?
Perhaps by color? Is the glass from the green glass bottle on the counter as appears in home sale photos of 156 CBR?
My original opinion was that the "glass chards" [sic] were from the green bottle. But that makes no sense. How would the glass be transported to the vehicle? MC was murdered at CBR so no need to return her body to the vehicle ,,, and why would the perp have glass on him? Well, we can assume for numerous methods.
Also odd: the six phone calls placed (to a #, the owners of which claim not to know MC and they claim no messages were left by MC) from MC's cell phone within minutes of MC having left the Academy of Hair Design parking lot. Then a text message to her boyfriend. No calls were made from the cell phone after 1542, with the phone powered off by 1742. No pings since.
It is rumored the # dialed from MC's phone belongs to the family of one of MC's boyfriend's co-workers. I wonder if MC's boyfriend had ever used MC's cell phone?
Love triangle, crime of passion.
..