cluciano63
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 41,198
- Reaction score
- 27,303
Too upset to talk with police about your missing child?
Please...
Please...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly. After reading the declaration, I find myself wondering if the children had a GAL and if not, why?
She knows they aren't true. According to that declaration, he passed a polygraph.
I fixed the link in my original post - here is another...
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/Decl+of+Solomon+Metalwala.pdf
Clearly his attorney wrote that for him. IMO
Julia is much too devastated to speak to LE. That's the info. he has been told by her "camp."
Julia is much too devastated to speak to LE. That's the info. he has been told by her "camp."
Yes, and I doubt dad would like about passing a poly in the declaration, because it is easily verifiable.
Additionally, the declaration exemplifies the same level of cooperation from dad during the divorce and custody proceedings as it does now with Sky's disappearance.
I also find myself wondering about JB's two friends which were named in the declaration. I wonder what they are thinking now regaring Sky's disappearance. Have they had an uh oh moment realizing exactly how ill their friend JB is and that perhaps dad was right regarding the childrens well being? Of course JB is the one ultimately responsible, just saying.
Too upset to talk with police about your missing child?
Please...
Since I'm going through a GAL locally I can tell you what I do know.
We'd see an appointment for GAL in the court documents. There is a specific order including the scope of the investigation. I didn't see that document listed, and quite frankly, I'm shocked. On that document the court generates three names, each side crosses off a name and you're left with the third.
I'm frankly shocked that, even if neither side requested one, that it wasn't ordered just the same. It would have been useful getting to the bottom of things. My GAL is talking to therapists, doctors, schools, police, prosecutors, CPS, you name it in my case. She has the legal right to consider listening to my audio recording, even though the same court has barred it's use--I'm not sure why, but it's an investigative right CPS and GALs have locally. This is a tool these children desperately needed, given the nature of the accusations back and forth.
BBMWow! That's a bombshell document there.
Even if you assume that dad is putting the most positive spin on things (from his perspective), it is still a chilling read. And to be honest, from my read on it, it sounds more like he is trying to be as exact as he can be, rather than trying to score points. Nor does anything he writes conflict with what we see in mom's facebook or flicker accounts, or the things we have learned since.
Sadly, it seems he was correct. Mom never got the help she needed. Her friends, not understanding just how crazy she was, helped her keep him away. And even though he was telling the truth, no one listened.
As I have been saying for some time, I think it is only LUCK that we are looking for only one child.
Did they say if there would be a second presser today, or will the next presser be tomorrow morning?
I'm really interested to see what pans out tomorrow. It seems to me that will be the day they decide whether to charge Julia with a neglect related offense, to force her to talk to them, and get her in custody.
So her lawyer appears willing to allow LE to charge her with a CRIME (which I don't believe they would be considering at this point, if she were cooperating) rather than have her submit, in his presence, to police questioning.
Crazy like a fox. : (
After reading dad's declaration and giving things a little more thought I have somewhat revised my opinion (not that anyone would care).
I think now what we are looking at is a tragedy more than a crime (which is not to say that no charges should or will be filed of course). I think we are looking at a mom who suffered from a handful of extreme mental illnesses. She was probably expert in hiding these from her friends, and in manipulating the people around her. The one person who really knew and understood the problem, well, he was the dad, so mom's friends are certainly not going to listen to HIM.
I think the courts and caseworkers dropped the ball here. They didn't look closely enough at mom's history, and they didn't realize what and who they were dealing with.
Mom needed HELP. What she got, instead, was enabling.
In any case, the police have damn near everything they need to convict this woman already.