Oh dear.
I just don't see protective parents in this mess, not anywhere.
They didn't protect JB, why would they protect B?
And protect him from what, exactly? He was 9...there is no death penalty for a 9 year old, they can't even be held legally responsible for what they do.
Tell me...how does the "lets protect Burke theory" actually play out? I'm going to try to imagine it.
Burke (and JB) both perform the next-to-impossible, meaning an 18.5 hour day (at least)of FULL ON excitement, presents, friends etc, to play a midnight game of doctors.
Let's say it happened in JB's bed.
If they were both lying down in bed, how did she get hit across the head? The wound is in the position of someone bringing a weapon down hard on the top of her head, unless B was perched on the headboard above her, he didn't belt her in the bed.
So he was making JB peform some oral act and she was kneeling...so why hit her? She was on her knees, doing as she was told.
When you hit a child over the head very hard, the first thing they do is scream.
JB screamed, woke her parents, who rushed into her bedroom and found Burke looking very very guilty?
Ok so then they lugged her (still alive) body down to the basement, all while forgetting to tell Burke to go to his room and DO NOT COME OUT until we come to get you?
Meanwhile JB is still breathing, they snap off a paintbrush and molest her? Tie her up? Write notes? Forget to brief Burke the one who's being covered for?
It just doesn't make sense...not logical...unless I'm missing something?
:cow:
SapphireSteel,
Of course you are. Thats why it does not make any sense, similarly for most IDI.
Sometimes murder and sexual assault do not progress along a logical path, this is why other theories, e.g. DocG, are so appealing, they offer a linear narrative. Which of course never took place.
.