Chilly Willy
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2007
- Messages
- 7,762
- Reaction score
- 3
I didn't watch it and I'm not going to.
It seems right to me that Casey be mentioned and considered 'part' of it.
These things are for the ones who are left behind. To share the memories, the joys, the sorrows. Casey is part of that family. She was part of the life that is now gone.
The family has changed. 1 member died and the will be locked away from them forever. They can see her, but not touch her. This is alot for a family to mentally take in. They are grieving. For a grand-daughter, but also a daughter.
This wasn't about punishing the person who did this to Caylee. This isn't about Justice. This is about love and lost. It's about good bye.
To the family, I'm sure that every minute that Casey has been born, hasn't been all bad. I"m sure they have some good memories of her with Caylee as well. When there is a 'loss', families tend to remember more of the good, then the bad. To let the 'bye gones' be, well.. gone.
Let them have this time. They shouldn't have to defend themselves over this part of the grief process.
Very well said, Spangle. I have a friend who lost a child in the seventh month of her pregnancy. Many people did not understand her grief; in their minds the child never actually existed. In the mind of my friend, not only did the child exist, but in her dreams she took him to his first day of kindergarten. She envisioned him losing his first tooth, dating his first girlfriend, being the star quarterback on the football team, graduating high school, going to college, getting married and giving her grandchildren, bringing them home for holidays. She didn't lose a fetus, she lost her grown child. If the A's aren't ready to give up on their dreams of what Casey could have been who are we to judge them? What gives us the right?