Thanks for looking that up.:tyou:
I was the blogtalk caller which mentioned that said CA had talked and/or texted to KC every day and thus GA knew that ICA was not in the trunk and also, at the time, I am sure they felt certain that Caylee was also alive and not in the trunk - because it could not comprehend that KC would have killed her and KC was assuring them that she was well and happy.
That post of CA testimony also stated that GA asked CA about her calls with ICA every day during that time, which I also remember.
After another caller said CA talked to KC that day, Richard H. said that the SA should have asked about CA telling George that she talked to KC, but as that testimony showed, it was brought up that they talked about KC's calls every day. But, the fact that Richard (and others) did not remember that testimony bothers me, in that it has started me thinking about the little (but what could later be very important) details in all witnesses testimony that can easily be overlooked by jurors.
Can the jurors get transcripts of all the testimony when they go to deliberations?