BeanE
Inactive
In answer to above, as best I can...I just don't see the same kind of person, necessarily, wanting an irksome husband dead, possibly said in jest but even if not, and someone who would carry out a plan to murder a child they have basically raised for years. Not saying this person would not be on my list of suspects, even high on the list, but if I was a profiler, I would have to say these are not similar crimes. Just because someone will commit a crime, or even has committed a crime, does not mean they have committed all crimes within their realm.
i.e. Ron Cummings...is a criminal (drug dealer) possibly a (gun) thief. But even LE does not think he harmed his daughter.
I there is a link between trying to hire someone to murder a spouse, and 'disappearing' a child for whom one has been primary caretaker for years. The link is the willingness to remove the person from one's life completely. Indeed, to remove them from the world.
With MFH, divorce is not enough - the person is looking to excise the person from their life entirely. Excise them from the world.
'Disappearing' the child, whether by murder, murder for hire, selling, is doing the same thing. In this case, Kyron was not Terri's child. She had no obligations to him. She could have left and had nothing to do with him ever again. But that would not have been enough. Again, she would have been looking to excise him completely from her life, and from the world.
Another link in this specific case, if indeed Terri did both the MFH plot w/Kaine, and disappeared Kyron, would be what may have led her to want, and to be willing, to do both.
With her husband, perhaps she felt he was distant, uninvolved with her, stand offish from her life and all that was important to her. A bit in his own world. That would draining after some years. There she was taking care of his child, doing extras she didn't have to do like going to his school events etc, but not getting anything back. That's draining.
So there could be a commonality - a husband not feeding her emotional soul so to speak, a child, and young children inherently need rather than give back. Two people she might feel were draining her. Commonality.
I would add to that that for most of us, we resolve those feelings of being drained. We talk to our spouse, we get a babysitter for our child and go to the spa or out to lunch with the girls. We keep an overall balance in what we give, and what we get back.
If we feel our spouse is too much of an emotional drain, after a while, we leave, or have an affair, or get a new career or hobby.
With a stepchild, we might see if the other parents can work something out where they're taking more of the responsibility so we get a break, hire babysitters more often, set up more playdates at someone else's home, send the child to summer camp, send them to military store, or we leave and say we're not taking care of someone else's child any more.
But what about someone who's not well-equipped emotionally? Someone who doesn't know how to communicate to their spouse effectively that they're feeling drained and want more? Who doesn't think to try to fill the emptiness elsewhere? Or more extreme, can't fill the emptiness, nothing's ever enough?
What about someone who's not equipped for whatever reason to say hey I don't want to do this much for your child - you need to step up? Or doesn't think to hire babysitters more often or some other solution?
Or what about a person who's sort of a professional victim? One who gives and gives and gives... and complains and complains and complains. Look at all I do for you! Look at all I do for everyone! Why doesn't anybody do anything for me? Why don't people do more for me?
I've known a lot some people in my life, and some of them just obviously didn't know how to go about filling the emptiness. Therapy would have helped them a great deal.
But back to my point, now that I've written a book, this second commonality between spouse and child would be a perception on Terri's part, if she is the perp, of being drained by both people, resentment builds up over years, and she becomes angry, and then decides to do something about it. Not only to stop the drain, but to punish both for not giving her what she needs. It may have been impossible for anyone on earth to meet those needs, but she may not even be aware of that.
If it does turn out Terri is the perp, this is direction I'll be headed to look for motive.
But first I need to see some evidence that tells me she did try a MFH plot, and that she did 'disappear' Kyron.
Just some stuff that's been cooking in my brain on a low simmer while I wait.
And just for reference, there's nothing in my post that blames Kaine or Kyron, or that bashes Kaine. I don't feel any blame, I don't think any blame, and I think Kaine is a pretty good guy - I have no urge to bash him.
This is about Terri's possible perceptions, if she proves to be the perp.