More than you know.
Glad to hear it!
Senseless. Keeping the DNA a mystery keeps RDI alive. Fact is, it IS a mystery, and thats why you're still able to talk.
That sword cuts both ways my friend. The question you should ask yourself is, which is more important: clearing the Ramseys, or finding justice?
Bring on the DNA owner, it will be an asian male who never worked in an underwear factory.
Well, that's kind of the problem for all of us, isn't it? We'll just have to wait until that happens. And I'm not holding my breath!
Hello?
This is a fine time to be hello-ing!
The most obvious answer as to why DNA from an unknown person was on JBR not once, not twice, but thrice isn't secondary transfer.
Like I've told you before, HOTYH, if it weren't for everything else, I'd be right there with you! But touch DNA cannot be seen in a vacuum.
Secondary is inherently less likely than direct, when it comes to double touch DNA deposits. Its not my fault if you're blind to that.
Number one, no, it is not your fault. My views have nothing to do with you at all. Likewise, a lot of things aren't my fault, either. Number two, contrary to what you might think, I'm neither blind nor stupid! It would be a lot better for some if I were!
In fact, Bode doesn't even list secondary transfer as a possibility!
I'm sure they don't, for a number of reasons!
That's only here on this forum,
That's not exactly true, HOTYH. Experts like Cyril Wecht have expressed their doubts as well.
so have fun with it.
I ain't here for fun, pilgrim.
Bode wouldn't even talk to you, remember?
Makes me wonder what they have to hide!How could I possibly forget?!
Admit what?
Exactly what you said:
I can say that because I was firmly IDI long before the DNA. It just did a fine job of corroborating my view, thats all.
My point is that unlike Mary Lacy, you'll admit that. She was IDI from Day One by her own admission. The DNA just gave her an excuse, which is probably what she was looking for all along. I promise you, HOTYH, she would have cleared the Rs before leaving office, DNA or no DNA.
That I was IDI before the DNA,
Yeah, we know!
and the DNA strengthened the IDI totality of evidence while weakening RDI totality of evidence (inarguable).
HOTYH, I actually like the way you worded that. I actually agree with it, at least for now. As Clint Van Zandt said, it's still 50-50.