Oh I've mentioned it before as well as many many others, especially after reading the following.....
2006-08-29: Boulder District Attorney, Mary Lacy Press Conference
"No-one is really cleared of a homicide until theres a conviction"
Man: "Speaking of the ongoing nature of your investigation, then would it be fair to say that is any involvement by John or Patsy Ramsey completely ruled out by your office? Are you committed to an intruder theory of the crime?"
Mary Lacy: "What we are committed to is solving the crime if we possibly can.. You know, theres these terms out there Umbrella of suspicion, we dont use that. You know, no-one is really cleared of a homicide until theres a conviction, in court beyond a reasonable doubt. And I dont think you will get any prosecutor
unless they were present with the person at the time of the crime
to clear someone. Where, like in this case the facts are so strange
you know
obviously the family was in the house at the time
the DNA does not match
now
so what we can say is
I think an expert said its
you have to look at stranger, male DNA in the underwear of the dead victim."
She said no one can be cleared without a conviction..... Which is what RDI has said all along...
She also said strange DNA (TDNA is what she should have said) should be looked at. What she didnt say is that TDNA belongs to the killer because even she knows, it takes more then that....