What Is the Defense Strategy #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I'm not disagreeing with you at all about Casey holding something over their head because imo she was, definitely. The statement she made about not saying anything either. However, for me it really is as simple as Caylee was what she had to hold over her parents head(are you a grandmother with a daughter similar to Casey?) and not saying anything was referring to her keeping her yap shut and not further incriminating herself. I still think the A's submissive behavior was due to knowing Casey so well and they knew she'd threaten to just not speak to them as she eventually did do. In one jailhouse video she made the threat when she didn't like the questions so they kissed her behind real quick. An accepted way of life for these people. How bad it had gotten even SP told LE. If GA tried to intervene it looks like she had no problem getting CA to kick him out. MH verified the tactics Casey used on her parents. I guess I could go on and since there are countless instances so I'll stop there. Casey is a drama queen as it is and now wants to be playing the role of victim so....

You're more than likely right and thank the lord I'm not involved with someone like this. It's just been incredible watching this unfold and I thought there must be more. Just plain evilness is the answer and like others are saying they are planning an accident theory.
 
I smell a motion coming for a bench trial....

I believe ICA might forego a jury and have His Honor be the jury...I think after hearing how he was protecting ICA's rights, she has trust in him...JMHO

Justice for Caylee

In the murder trial I testified at, the defendant went for this option; no jury and let the judge decide (because the judge liked the defendant).

End result: LWOP
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
I'm really thinking they are pulling for a mistrial over the jury/media insatuation....I have seen that video of HHJP to many times as of late where he covered that one case where someone was set free due to not being able to get a jury.....upon that cm started to rub ica back and she alerted....to me it is that jury pool and what they plan to do with it---if it goes much further---warm up the bus its headed full steam ahead for anthonyville.....:maddening:

I am also really really :furious::snooty::hand::pillowfight::hot: over the dt complains of the media yet.................:maddening::noooo::noooo::anguish::pullhair::coffeews::panic: continues to do these "humble" (JC word to discribe cm --- ryan used it as well:sick::sigh::hot:) interviews....put the words out there....yep that will do somethin'

OMG! I never knew about that case!!! :panic:
 
Yep, they read here.

"Casey Anthony’s attorney, Cheney Mason, revealed in an interview with “In Session” he follows blogs covering the murder case. Cheney didn’t hold back in his interview, even stooped to name calling. The attorney ,who lost credibility by flip flopping about Casey’s guilt, called bloggers idiots."

http://www..com/2011/05/c...ggers-idiotic/

If CM really did follow bloggers ,he would know much more about this case and would not have made some dumb statements in court.There have been times when we (idiots that we are) obviously knew more about what was going on than CM did.
He reminds me of a school house bully.
 
I have had my AHA moment. I have been reading all the different theories AND the request by C&G to visit KC. Here goes:

I have two possible scenarios here, one weak and one that might fly. First one, George was baby sitting Caylee on the 16th because KC was still sleeping or 'working'. He was so involved in whatever show he was watching, he did not notice Caylee slip out into the back yard and she drowned in the pool. the problem with this one is explaining why KC drove around with Caylee in the trunk. Can't say George did it because people saw KC in her car.

Here is what I think the defense team will say: Caylee's death was an accident while she was in KC's care. Kc reacted as she did, driving around, dumping the body, because of abuse by George and how terrified she was at having to admit what happened to George and her overbearing mother. Now comes the reason for the new visit: during the TAPED visit, George breaks down and cries and cries and apologizes to KC for all the abuse and what this caused her to be like (we can through in every single bad behavior and lie for the last 10 years!) and begs her to forgive him. Cindy is shocked, just shocked, as she had no idea whatsoever that George was this horrible man. She too, breaks down in tears, apologizing to KC for not 'seeing' what was really going on and saying the reason she (Cindy)has been overbearing is because she has had to deal with George all these years. She can also say she too, is afraid of him and his temper and that is why she allowed him to come back home. Cindy then tells George never to darken her doorway again, so to speak. Of course the defense will argue to have this video introduced as evidence. this covers any questions of why George is still living with Cindy (she did not know how bad he was) and why George has been absent from the hearings unless he had to testify - his guilt which caused him to say that he would do anything to help his daughter.
 
Not sure yet how it will happen, but I do believe that the defense team will bring in the fight on the 15th between Cindy and Casey. It's going to be ugly, especially given that Cindy has denied, denied and denied it happening.
 
If CM really did follow bloggers ,he would know much more about this case and would not have made some dumb statements in court.There have been times when we (idiots that we are) obviously knew more about what was going on than CM did.
He reminds me of a school house bully.

Exactly! Same reason he was so furious with K Belich. He is easily intimidated by people who know more than him. Particularly if they are women. Then you see the bully in him emerge.
 
I have had my AHA moment. I have been reading all the different theories AND the request by C&G to visit KC. Here goes:

I have two possible scenarios here, one weak and one that might fly. First one, George was baby sitting Caylee on the 16th because KC was still sleeping or 'working'. He was so involved in whatever show he was watching, he did not notice Caylee slip out into the back yard and she drowned in the pool. the problem with this one is explaining why KC drove around with Caylee in the trunk. Can't say George did it because people saw KC in her car.

Here is what I think the defense team will say: Caylee's death was an accident while she was in KC's care. Kc reacted as she did, driving around, dumping the body, because of abuse by George and how terrified she was at having to admit what happened to George and her overbearing mother. Now comes the reason for the new visit: during the TAPED visit, George breaks down and cries and cries and apologizes to KC for all the abuse and what this caused her to be like (we can through in every single bad behavior and lie for the last 10 years!) and begs her to forgive him. Cindy is shocked, just shocked, as she had no idea whatsoever that George was this horrible man. She too, breaks down in tears, apologizing to KC for not 'seeing' what was really going on and saying the reason she (Cindy)has been overbearing is because she has had to deal with George all these years. She can also say she too, is afraid of him and his temper and that is why she allowed him to come back home. Cindy then tells George never to darken her doorway again, so to speak. Of course the defense will argue to have this video introduced as evidence. this covers any questions of why George is still living with Cindy (she did not know how bad he was) and why George has been absent from the hearings unless he had to testify - his guilt which caused him to say that he would do anything to help his daughter.

Don't think that will work. First and foremost, GA was a police officer who after 10 years would have performed CPR on Caylee and told KC to call 911. Accident happen in pools and parents are not charged. And the last thing GA would have agreed to was calling LE in after 31 days.

When you think about it, the way it is described in discovery it sounds like an immature 22 year old just got tired of being a Mom. jmo
 
So what are everyone's thoughts on why the parents - CA and GA - have requested a visit with ICA this week before the trial starts?

........Getting stories straight?.......Letting her know they won't go along with any far fetched tales where they take the blame? ....Wishing her Godspeed? :banghead:

Let's hear some theories about whether or not this fits in with some Defense scenario. Apparently waiting for Baez to give permission .....on behalf of ICA of course! Of course! :innocent:

Too me, its simple. They KNOW the tape will be released and used at trial. The DT needs to get KC's story in about the abuse or whatever story the defense was trying to have admitted via the doctors. They don't want to put KC on the stand for cross examination, so this is how they plan to do it. On the video expect KC to talk about her state of mind in the 31 days. Here it is folks. The AHA moment JB was hoping for. The jury will see right through the BS. :floorlaugh:
 
If CM really did follow bloggers ,he would know much more about this case and would not have made some dumb statements in court.There have been times when we (idiots that we are) obviously knew more about what was going on than CM did.
He reminds me of a school house bully.

Or, is smart enough to keep his mouth shut.
 
If the DT goes through this mock jail visit I say ICA is doomed. If the jury had any doubt she was innocent, it would be gone in a second. A jury will weigh things, but most people don't like to be fooled and have the wool pulled over their eyes.

Who sits in jail for 3 years if it was an accident. ICA Can't say she was scared of her parents because of the jail videos proving she was the boss in this family and she called the shots. Can't say it was ugly coping because she acted exactly the same before Caylee died with all the partying and don't get me started on the video of her at blockbuster smooching away with Tony. Any human in their right mind (And Casey, according to the doctors is sane) would not have acted as if nothing happened IF there were an accident. She acted like a criminal who had the time to think things through and knew she had to act normal to cover up her crime- consciousness of guilt.

So three years sitting in prison then admitting it was an accident a week before jury selection, then Cindy & George asking softball questions to ICA. Then add in the jail letters where ICA says her lawyer promised her a mistrial. Hahahaha! I think the SA will be able to tie all of this so neatly together and show exactly how much of a SOCIOPATH Casey truly is and show how sleazy her lawyers are. Go ahead DT try to make fools of the jury and see what you get back - I dare you.

I agree, if the DT tries this plan in front of a reasonable jury ICA is toast.

However, I just read an article this morning about two 17 year old males who got their kicks by setting a live dog on fire. It was on video tape! One juror refused to convict because she thought the 'boys' were too young to be charged with such a heinous crime. The dog suffered horribly and had to be euthanized.

Jury selection is everything and it only takes one jury to have that sort of skewed thinking.

IMO
 
I agree, if the DT tries this plan in front of a reasonable jury ICA is toast.

However, I just read an article this morning about two 17 year old males who got their kicks by setting a live dog on fire. It was on video tape! One juror refused to convict because she thought the 'boys' were too young to be charged with such a heinous crime. The dog suffered horribly and had to be euthanized.

Jury selection is everything and it only takes one jury to have that sort of skewed thinking.

IMO

Slightly ot but a man in Orange County was just given 30 years for fracturing a baby's head and then pouring boiling water on the baby instead of calling 911.
 
I do not understand why posters are suddenly showing such distress about what the DT is up to because of a flurry of pre-trial publicity.

Suddenly we seem to think there are secrets, conspiracies and who knows what else - and don't you get it?

This is exactly what the Defense wants - to start reasonable doubt. Hello? A little sashaying to the left and a little doe-si-doeing to the right and suddenly it was a "tragic accident - very unfortunate" - from Cheney Mason of all people! And suddenly we are talking about it and believing it is CA and GA who are setting it up? C'mon!

If posters are this easily swayed at the eleventh hour by a pile of chit placed in our path by the Defense, well then I guess ICA IS going to walk out that door. We've fine toothed combed this evidence for more than two years and remained convinced we know who the guilty party is.

What's going on? The Defense has no more this week than they had last week as they have had for the last four years. Nada - but a few ludicrous theories they are prepared to float. If the DT really does read here - I'm certain they are high-fiving around saying "hey! we finally found something that is working"

Of note, CM made a visit to ICA the other day - his SECOND one this year. Wow. And he reads blogs - :seeya: Hi Mr. Mason!
 
This three ring circus now has additional rings being added to it by not only the DT but certain media clowns and they are most likely in cahoots. IMO that is where the distress is coming from. I don't believe in any way that our views on KC's guilt are being swayed but that the DT and certain media outlets are trying to sway the audience in a different direction than ours, in a way that will get them ratings. I do doubt that they(the media) have not done a thorough job of picking through all the transcripts, depo's, time lines, evidence as the people here have...and I highly doubt that the have as much time invested in this case. The AHA moment won't be coming from the DT but from the prosecution during opening statements.
 
I do not understand why posters are suddenly showing such distress about what the DT is up to because of a flurry of pre-trial publicity.

Suddenly we seem to think there are secrets, conspiracies and who knows what else - and don't you get it?

This is exactly what the Defense wants - to start reasonable doubt. Hello? A little sashaying to the left and a little doe-si-doeing to the right and suddenly it was a "tragic accident - very unfortunate" - from Cheney Mason of all people! And suddenly we are talking about it and believing it is CA and GA who are setting it up? C'mon!

If posters are this easily swayed at the eleventh hour by a pile of chit placed in our path by the Defense, well then I guess ICA IS going to walk out that door. We've fine toothed combed this evidence for more than two years and remained convinced we know who the guilty party is.

What's going on? The Defense has no more this week than they had last week as they have had for the last four years. Nada - but a few ludicrous theories they are prepared to float. If the DT really does read here - I'm certain they are high-fiving around saying "hey! we finally found something that is working"

Of note, CM made a visit to ICA the other day - his SECOND one this year. Wow. And he reads blogs - :seeya: Hi Mr. Mason!


:blowkiss:

You are soooo correct once again! This is all simply a media ploy! Shhesh!

The facts of this have not, and will not change!

It is all pre-trial BS. OMG... Geragos did the same thing for SP~!

I do not anticipate this trial lasting more than 5 - 6 weeks. The defense wants you to believe they need 3 - 4 weeks for "their case". Uh huh... ok

Sure JB stood up and said he needed 3 - 4 weeks for his case! Really? Geragos said the same thing.. This is all pre-trial baloney~!
 
I do not understand why posters are suddenly showing such distress about what the DT is up to because of a flurry of pre-trial publicity.

Suddenly we seem to think there are secrets, conspiracies and who knows what else - and don't you get it?

This is exactly what the Defense wants - to start reasonable doubt. Hello? A little sashaying to the left and a little doe-si-doeing to the right and suddenly it was a "tragic accident - very unfortunate" - from Cheney Mason of all people! And suddenly we are talking about it and believing it is CA and GA who are setting it up? C'mon!

If posters are this easily swayed at the eleventh hour by a pile of chit placed in our path by the Defense, well then I guess ICA IS going to walk out that door. We've fine toothed combed this evidence for more than two years and remained convinced we know who the guilty party is.

What's going on? The Defense has no more this week than they had last week as they have had for the last four years. Nada - but a few ludicrous theories they are prepared to float. If the DT really does read here - I'm certain they are high-fiving around saying "hey! we finally found something that is working"

Of note, CM made a visit to ICA the other day - his SECOND one this year. Wow. And he reads blogs - :seeya: Hi Mr. Mason!

That is so right ! Every time I feel a twinge of anxiety that they have hit on some method of bamboozling a Jury I say to myself "Self, this is JB and CM you're talking about- what have you seen so far in their court appearances that makes you worried?" . hmmm Nothing.
JB would have to borrow a neuron from CM in order to have two to think with and CM is so past it he doesn't even know he's past it.
 
That is so right ! Every time I feel a twinge of anxiety that they have hit on some method of bamboozling a Jury I say to myself "Self, this is JB and CM you're talking about- what have you seen so far in their court appearances that makes you worried?" . hmmm Nothing.
JB would have to borrow a neuron from CM in order to have two to think with and CM is so past it he doesn't even know he's past it.



Tooo funny! Thanks - I feel better now - I was feeling earlier that I was the only one left standing......:party: and sure enough - you're still with me! Whew!
 
I do not understand why posters are suddenly showing such distress about what the DT is up to because of a flurry of pre-trial publicity.

Suddenly we seem to think there are secrets, conspiracies and who knows what else - and don't you get it?

This is exactly what the Defense wants - to start reasonable doubt. Hello? A little sashaying to the left and a little doe-si-doeing to the right and suddenly it was a "tragic accident - very unfortunate" - from Cheney Mason of all people! And suddenly we are talking about it and believing it is CA and GA who are setting it up? C'mon!

If posters are this easily swayed at the eleventh hour by a pile of chit placed in our path by the Defense, well then I guess ICA IS going to walk out that door. We've fine toothed combed this evidence for more than two years and remained convinced we know who the guilty party is.

What's going on? The Defense has no more this week than they had last week as they have had for the last four years. Nada - but a few ludicrous theories they are prepared to float. If the DT really does read here - I'm certain they are high-fiving around saying "hey! we finally found something that is working"

Of note, CM made a visit to ICA the other day - his SECOND one this year. Wow. And he reads blogs - :seeya: Hi Mr. Mason!


Bwaaahaaa - you all can see how upset I was right about where I BBM - when I get emotional - my dyslexia gets worse and all numbers are one "up" from real time!!!
 
[/B]

Tooo funny! Thanks - I feel better now - I was feeling earlier that I was the only one left standing......:party: and sure enough - you're still with me! Whew!

I said that in partial jest but I do have the feeling when he talks and rambles that he is in the early stages of Alzheimers and is not aware.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
183
Guests online
233
Total visitors
416

Forum statistics

Threads
608,477
Messages
18,240,096
Members
234,385
Latest member
johnwich
Back
Top