~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
True, true.
Thank you for the reminder on both of your points. I hadn't thought of either when I was composing my post. I followed the SP case as well; but did not post very much during that case.
ICA is infamous, OJ famous, and I understand the difference.
There is more evidence in this case. Wysteria listen to KaRN!:smile:
The points you make settle me down a bit.
Nice to read you again btw, I'll presume that you are the KaRN. You and I discussed/debated both of the trials mentioned in your post and also the MJ trial. I didn't post often, so you may not remember me.
IIRC the SA is treating this case like all of the other cases in that they are not going to hire a jury consultant. Some say no biggie; I say I'd feel less uneasy if the SA hired one. I just have this THING stuck in my head about how important a jury is. For sure the jury is important; but sometimes it's my only focus, irrational...I know.
I think that the closer we get to trial the more anxiety I'm going to feel.
I thought you were familiar! :blowkiss: Great to see you Wysteria! I was worried throughout the SP case what the jury was thinking. In retrospect I was giving the Court TV TH`s opinions way more credit than they really deserved. The same thing during MJ.
I really believe the SA has a compelling case against ICA and hold one or more smoking guns that won`t be revealed until trial. When they put the DP back on the table and when JA spoke so eloquently during the hearing while ICA begged to make him stop I knew that she knew that he knew her dirty secret even if we don`t yet.
There also may be someone in the AG`s office who specializes in consulting so it`s not required for them to hire someone from the outside. JB has complained several times about all the dozens of people the SA has working on the case. Boohoo
Also in the other cases we worried over, the defendants had money they could throw at their own defense and did. ICA is indigent and not eligible for a JAC funded consultant. HHJBP already ruled there would be no additional funding for a defense jury consultant
`During Thursday's hearing, Chief Judge Belvin Perry denied requests to spend public money on four expert witnesses and forensic tests requested by Anthony's defense attorneys. The judge nixed a trace evidence expert, a cell phone expert, a jury consultant and money for a car to replicate evidence found in Anthony's car.`
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20004299-504083.html
Have faith my friend!! Caylee has many angels here on earth, 12 of whom will be seated next May in as many days as my ticker says.
IMO there really isn`t a demogrphic that wouldn`t find ICA offensive. She stole from the frail elderly in palliative care. Rule out jurors over the age of 50 IMO. She stole and lied to her friends so jurors under 30 might not relate well to her either. Parents with young children will likely be horrified. Single Mothers who work and struggle to provide good homes aren`t going to relate to a single Mom who pays no rent, doesn`t need to work and parties like a rock star every weekend. Nobody can relate to the 31 days. Young men may find her hot until they present the text messages between her and TonE, or JG takes the stand, or.....when they see a huge image of her tattoo with the strange skin affliction that got CA all worried enough to write her about.
The more I type the more convinced I am we`ll have our guilty verdict 10 minutes after the jury is dismissed to deliberate. :woohoo:
Caylees 12 angels want us to hear this message
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UkKTlzyLhQ[/ame]
Don`t stress Wysteria!!
