Quotes from AZlawyer on her opinions of possible Defense strategy:
Originally Posted by AZlawyer
"If, as the defense team said, it is NOT about a mental health defense (i.e., not saying that Casey was not responsible for her actions) and also NOT about diminished capacity (i.e., not saying that Casey is intellectually impaired), then my guess is that it will be about how and why her state of mind caused her to act guilty if she was really not guilty. From the dancing to the IMs to the statements to LE...the whole enchilada."
"Hmmm I posted a defense theory a week or so back [March 21, 2011] that would require a state of mind witness, and would NOT be a mental health defense and would also NOT be a diminished capacity issue..." [the Defense filed Motions to add "state of mind" witnesses on March 22, 2011]
"I suppose I would go for the theory that Caylee died in a terrible accident, not caused by any culpable negligence on Casey's part, following which Casey engaged in an idiotic cover-up attempt out of mortal terror of her mother, during which she was able to present a "happy face" to the world by suppressing her emotions deep into her subconscious, a symptom of her mental illness caused by the emotional and sexual abuse by her parents and brother. The "Bella Vita" tattoo was to help her remember the beautiful life of her baby, because the emotional suppression caused by her mental illness scared even her. Caylee was the only thing in Casey's life that ever broke through the mental illness and brought out normal emotions in her, so after Caylee was gone Casey's illness got even worse, explaining her horrifically ice-cold statements to police."
"The theory I posted would not be a defense. It is a theory that Casey did NOT kill Caylee but acted...umm...non-innocent after NOT killing Caylee because she is a little strange in the brain."
"No, I think they will describe her state of mind in order to explain to the jury her extremely odd (i.e., happy) attitude after...whatever happened to Caylee that was not Casey's fault. Allegedly."
"Yep. I think somehow the defense just recently realized that they didn't have to just use "ugly coping" in a vacuum but instead could say that someone was "ugly coping" BECAUSE of some mental issue. Not a disease or even a disorder, necessarily, but some ability to dissociate oneself from reality in a terrible, stressful situation."
"In my version of the "ugly coping" theory, Casey had been mentally ill for a lengthy period of time due to sexual and emotional abuse by her family, and was, because of that, able to dissociate herself from reality and seem "happy" when really horrible things happened to her (like her daughter dying in a terrible accident). So her behavior before and after wouldn't have been any different, really."
"This state of mind thing IMO will likely be about how and why Casey's lack of mental health led her to act happy when she was really terrified/devastated.
ETA: Not that I think she was REALLY terrified/devastated. That's just what I think the defense is going to argue."
"I think they are going to use this state of mind expert to try to support a theory of innocence. Not that she killed Caylee and lied about it because of her state of mind, but that SOMETHING ELSE TERRIBLE happened to Caylee which was NOT Casey's fault, and Casey was able to suppress any emotional reaction to it because of her state of mind."
"Yes, that's why everyone was so shocked when they mentioned the new expert on Casey's "state of mind" today in court." [March 24, 2011]
"Oh, I agree, there are problems with any defense theory. This one I just think is the best of any out there. I would give it a 15% chance of winning."