I agree! The only other thing I can think might happen is they will remove him as a witness tomorrow without bringing it up.
Oh, how I hope the defense is allowed to put him on the stand.
JB: Mr. VT, it is true, is it not, that your phone number in July 2008 was 407-4*5-3082, is it not true, isn't it?
VT: Um, no. :waitasec:
JB: And you are not a chemist, ARE YOU NOT???
VT: No.
JB: No further questions.
You know what? I don't think there will be a made for LifeTime movie...I think there will be a mini-series. You can't make this up and I HAVE NEVER, NEVER seen anything quite like this case.
:floorlaugh:....but, wait...why would the DT need VT when their client claimed Caylee drowned "accidentally" in the backyard pool? Oh, I get it...GA misdials a number and what are the odds it is a e is allowed to put him on the stand.
AZLawyer said:JB: Mr. VT, it is true, is it not, that your phone number in July 2008 was 407-4*5-3082, is it not true, isn't it?
VT: Um, no. :waitasec:
JB: And you are not a chemist, ARE YOU NOT???
VT: No.
JB: No further questions.
Help. My brain is already running scared in anticipation of Baez's next attack on logic and common sense. And AZ's "sample" transcript has me bracing for the inevitable aural assault. Sometimes listening to Baez speak is akin to being f••ked in the ear by a cactus.
I swear, if that man ever manages to string together three properly constructed sentences, I'll eat my shoe.
you're absolutely right donnam, the damage has been done. He's already been out there coast to coast and around the world. IF he needs an attorney, I suggest AZlawyer - WS top legal eagle!
I had a choice tonight, either tune in and watch those crazy coupon clippers who shop and try to buy the most food for the least amount of money and then store it in their panty till it is out of date, or visit Websleuths. I'm glad I came here, this has been much more humorous and no one had to clip one coupon or make a fool of themselves at the grocery store check out.
jmo
I believe that was the point of it and I believe the defense knows this whole thing is bogus. I think this was a strategic leak by the defense to get George riled up before he takes the stand and make it more likely that he will lose his temper during questioning and show it to the jury. They have had George's phone records for almost 3 years now, if their people haven't checked them out until now and they are trying to pin this on him then they are more stupid than I thought.
ETA: and the only reason they are claiming to have just now come across this information is to have an excuse why they haven't deposed him yet. Then they can claim they didn't know it was a mistake in the database. Damage will already be done, VT's face and record are all over, George's image (in their minds) is tarnished in the public eye and he is REALLY TICKED when he comes into court.
I am still early in this thread but what infuriates me is that I believe the Defense found a stereotypical "big black guy with a scary record and a scary picture" and threw him right under the bus tires. I live in the south* and there is a sad history here of blaming a minority for whatever crime was done or not done and killing him for it. They are using this man simply because they know that some folks will see him and say "Ooooo, he so scary. I bet he did it." As a minority himself, JB should never have agreed to this farce! As a southerner, CM should hang his head in shame. And this admittedly felonious gentleman needs to sue for defamation.
*Actually, the north has its moments, too. Remember Willie Horton?
Sorry if this is OT but I have been stewing all day about this.
OMGosh, I didn't think of that until now. He's as mad as a wet hornet right now. I also believe the defense stalled until tomorrow so they can bring up the 3 year anniversary - making him more upset. Just my opinion, but unless they have an out of state witness on the stand will I ever believe their reason for a 1 day delay. I promise to take it back if they do! But my goodness, I can't imagine one of the first witnesses not to be a local (ala, George, Cindy, Lee or any other plethora of Floridians).
Just my opnion.
Gosh it's 1:00 AM, and I can't sleep - 5 hours until trial here on the WC. I have the feeling it won't be a pretty day and plan to have a candle lit right here on my desk -- for Caylee.
Night all!
Mel
My guess is the DT is going to put up as many alternate theories as they can to create reasonable doubt. It's their only chance! Drowning, sexual abuse, ex-con kidnapper called 24 hours before child is reported missing (although not sure how they tie that in the to previous 31 days?), suspicious meter reader visiting site of remains several times, etc. They just need create enough doubt....
you're absolutely right donnam, the damage has been done. He's already been out there coast to coast and around the world. IF he needs an attorney, I suggest AZlawyer - WS top legal eagle!
I had a choice tonight, either tune in and watch those crazy coupon clippers who shop and try to buy the most food for the least amount of money and then store it in their panty till it is out of date, or visit Websleuths. I'm glad I came here, this has been much more humorous and no one had to clip one coupon or make a fool of themselves at the grocery store check out.
jmo
I believe that was the point of it and I believe the defense knows this whole thing is bogus. I think this was a strategic leak by the defense to get George riled up before he takes the stand and make it more likely that he will lose his temper during questioning and show it to the jury. They have had George's phone records for almost 3 years now, if their people haven't checked them out until now and they are trying to pin this on him then they are more stupid than I thought.
ETA: and the only reason they are claiming to have just now come across this information is to have an excuse why they haven't deposed him yet. Then they can claim they didn't know it was a mistake in the database. Damage will already be done, VT's face and record are all over, George's image (in their minds) is tarnished in the public eye and he is REALLY TICKED when he comes into court.
I haven't yet read this thread's overnight postings so don't know if this was mentioned previously, but in defense of Vadir Thompson....
I read the link provided upstream of appeal paperwork concerning his "kidnapping conviction" and probation violation of repeated contact with his "victim".
The defense....ala media.....is suggesting that George may have contacted this "convicted kidnapper" for assistance in covering up Caylee's death....as if he has "previous experience" in grabbing a random victim and "stealing" them...
IF you read those Appeal documents, it is very clear regarding WHAT this conviction was....it involved Vadir and a "lady friend".
Vadir was arrested on probation violation after it was discovered that he was repeatedly contacting and visiting with the victim which was against his probation....court ordered them NO CONTACT during probation of 30 years....
But Vadir testified to judge that the woman was also calling him and visiting with him...
His "kidnapping" CLEARLY appears to be a domestic situation involving a girlfriend/wife who later claimed he held her against her will....after he got out of jail, the two just couldn't leave each other alone...
Remember the story ex-wfe Jill K told in her interview about how Kronk "kidnapped" her? Kronk was also apparently originally charged with kidnapping but all charges were dropped?
Just felt I needed to mention this as this Vadir is being wrongly portrayed as this big bad man who ran out and snatched someone and kidnapped them...if he did it once, why not again if GA $$ was good enough and this is NOT THE CASE!
I am sitting on needles waiting for court to convene and hear Jose argue this motion to the judge, but the reality will probably be that court opens, HHJP will bring up motion and Baez will then state "the defense withdraws the motion"...very ANTI-CLIMATIC!
BBM
This is exactly what I feared would occur...we already have the DT alleging some suspicious activity with what many believe to be your stereo typical criminal; with now, stereo-typical slang as to how this person would speak / respond.
I have no idea if this person uses broken English because I haven't heard him speak before. I'm assuming you have, since no one can predict a person's dialect, sentence structure or word usage from a picture...IMO.