"Who would leave children that young alone?"

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
The whole "spokesman" thing is bizarre imo,
I can understand that they may have needed a spokesperson in the early days but in the past couple of years, why would they need a spokesperson?
Is it too much for them to make a personal statement every so often, do they really need Clarence Mitchell to be trotted out to say they sympathise with April Jones parents or that they are releasing a new book, is it that difficult for them to personally do that?

I would suggest that they have a spokesperson in place to manage what is said, for what reason? only they know.

The moment the story changed for me, was the news that Gerry McCann was planning a "big event" that would have featured people like Elton John, this was in the first few weeks of Madeleine going missing (3rd June 2007 to be exact), who would be even thinking like that at that time, surely as Parents they would have been hoping and praying that Madeleine would be found the next day, not planning for months ahead to keep the profile up, a major faux pas from my way of thinking.

And the fund pays for this snakeoilsalesman, sorry, spokesman as if spinning and lying will help find their child its morally reprehensible
 
And the fund pays for this snakeoilsalesman, sorry, spokesman as if spinning and lying will help find their child its morally reprehensible


Everything they've ever said or done has been morally reprehensible, from the first time they left their babies alone and defenceless, through to criticising the police, refusing to be interviewed, instigating law suit after law suit on anyone who is trying to share information about the events of that night, and planning to profit financially from their daughter's loss.

My opinion only of course.

:cow:
 
Yup including charging people to send them posters when they had millions in their fund! As was kate mccann writing a book to rewrite history and be scathing about everyone who tried to help and casting aspersions at innocent people. look over THERE and everywhere and not here scenario. Disgraceful at best. Another psychopath. Catch up tomorrow.
 
If the McCann were as desperate as they claim to get their daughter back, the obvious way to do it would be to cooperate with the investigation at the time.

They did not.

Why not?

Andy Redmond is on record as saying the "best opportunity for finding out what happened" is his review.

How farcical. The best opportunity was the original investigation, surely. Which was shut down due to lack of cooperation from the Tapas 9.

No other reason.

:banghead:
 
:lol:

It's just inventing whole new levels of wrong, isn't it?

obviously someone cant help themselves

Just like appointing kate mccann as ambassador for missing kids

LOL

message to parents, wevebeentold leaving your babies alone at home with the door open and going out and coming back to check every half hour, just listening btw and not physicically checking either, is within the bounds of responsible parenting, our lawyers told us that So its true
See ya later


Madeleine was here part 1/5 - YouTube
 
I read that the Missing Child Charity has now dropped our Kate, like a hot stone.

Wonder why?

Could it have anything to do with the "review"?
 

Yes, that's the one.

They may still have her page on there, but they have dropped her (very quietly) as an Ambassador. You know that role she was boasting about on her own website, only a couple of months ago...?

http://www.findmadeleine.com/updates/index.html

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/who-we-are/ambassadors

I wonder why her brave yet dignified face is no longer listed?...:waitasec:

:cow:
 
I saw Kate's photo in the changing photo array on the front page. It doesn't say they dropped her to me.
 
wherher shes one or not its quite disgusting she should havebeen appointed inthe first place whenshe sends out the message that its ok to leave three babies alone out of ear and eyeshot 100 plus metres away for at least half an hour stretches or more, with the door open, and since her doing so resulted inher first born disappearing, nspcc and ss in the uk woukd have a hissy fit
:what:


its very responsible parenting they said and they wouldnt want to tell other parents not to do it and also thiusands of people wrote to them within 3 weeks and said they had done the same or woukd do exactly the same
 
I saw Kate's photo in the changing photo array on the front page. It doesn't say they dropped her to me.

They list the Ambassadors...there are only four.

She is no longer one of them. Sometime in the last couple of months, they "de-listed" her, without explanation.

I don't know why this is even being disputed. I provided the link to prove it. Perhaps you could counter with a link proving she is currently an ambassador for this charity?

:dunno:

I expect her other pictures and writings to slowly be withdrawn, too.

They appear to be very quietly tip toeing away from their association with her. I can't blame them.

:cow:
 
They list the Ambassadors...there are only four.

She is no longer one of them. Sometime in the last couple of months, they "de-listed" her, without explanation.

I don't know why this is even being disputed. I provided the link to prove it. Perhaps you could counter with a link proving she is currently an ambassador for this charity?

:dunno:

I expect her other pictures and writings to slowly be withdrawn, too.

They appear to be very quietly tip toeing away from their association with her. I can't blame them.

:cow:


If an organization wants to disassociate themselves from a person I would expect them to take her off their front page pronto and remove her page that says she's an ambassador https://news.www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/everyday-ways/the-big-tweet-2012 and all links to it.

But instead if you go to the missingpeople page and search through the red panel with links to sub-pages, Kate is the only person who gets a mention by NAME. It's not a very good way to tiptoe away from her quietly imo...

It may be she got involved with projects to begin with, not something forever.


KATE McCANN will never give up on finding daughter Madeleine – and from today she is putting the same willpower into helping trace other missing children too.

She is beginning a new role as official ambassador for the UK charity Missing People and launching a massive new billboard campaign searching for the nation’s lost loved ones.
...
For 12 weeks digital advertising space all over the UK will carry photos and information about missing people — mostly children.



Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...assador-for-missing-people.html#ixzz2DVKwRIjy

http://www.findmadeleine.com/updates/index.html
On Sept 20 she said that the campaign was in its 10th week so it's over now.
 
If an organization wants to disassociate themselves from a person I would expect them to take her off their front page pronto and remove her page that says she's an ambassador https://news.www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/everyday-ways/the-big-tweet-2012 and all links to it.

But instead if you go to the missingpeople page and search through the red panel with links to sub-pages, Kate is the only person who gets a mention by NAME. It's not a very good way to tiptoe away from her quietly imo...

It may be she got involved with projects to begin with, not something forever.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/updates/index.html
On Sept 20 she said that the campaign was in its 10th week so it's over now.

I made a statement merely that she appears to have been dropped as Ambassador, and it appears to be accurate.

She is no longer listed on the Ambassadors page.

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/who-we-are/ambassadors

I'd love some McCann supporters to bring something positive to the thread.

Some new ideas, new theories, new scenarios. Something positive instead of merely attempting to discredit.

:cow:
 
I made a statement merely that she appears to have been dropped as Ambassador, and it appears to be accurate.

:cow:



Actually you made the statement:

I read that the Missing Child Charity has now dropped our Kate, like a hot stone.


If someone's dropped like a hot stone I don't expect to see them advertise their charity with the stone's photo and name on the front page of their interwebz page but maybe that's just me.
 
This is the exact text from the site :


https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/everyday-ways/the-big-tweet-2012

Everyone at Missing People welcomes Kate McCann as a new Ambassador. In her new role, Kate will be working with the charity, other Ambassadors
and Family Representatives to:

- Raise awareness and understanding of the 'missing' issue
- Help the charity to safely reconnect more people by promoting 116 000 - the new number for 'missing'
- Help to raise vital funds so that the search for every missing person can continue

Our thanks go to Kate for so generously giving the charity her time and energy.

Click here to read about Kate's first mission - launching a new way to find missing people with the Outdoor Media Centre.
 
This is the exact text from the site :


https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/everyday-ways/the-big-tweet-2012

Everyone at Missing People welcomes Kate McCann as a new Ambassador. In her new role, Kate will be working with the charity, other Ambassadors
and Family Representatives to:

- Raise awareness and understanding of the 'missing' issue
- Help the charity to safely reconnect more people by promoting 116 000 - the new number for 'missing'
- Help to raise vital funds so that the search for every missing person can continue

Our thanks go to Kate for so generously giving the charity her time and energy.

Click here to read about Kate's first mission - launching a new way to find missing people with the Outdoor Media Centre.

Also from the site -

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/who-we-are/ambassadors

now you see her, now you don't.

Can you offer a credible explanation for why she's not listed anymore?

:cow:
 
Maybe they just haven't gotten around to putting her photo there yet?
 
Also from the site -

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/missing-people/who-we-are/ambassadors

now you see her, now you don't.

Can you offer a credible explanation for why she's not listed anymore?

:cow:

I have no idea why she is not on the other page as an ambassador - maybe she is a different ambassador maybe they are getting round to it maybe she wants to have a different role - tmor hands on

But to say in original post that the site has dropped her like a hot stone ( your words ) is just not true

She is posted on the FRONT Page and her bio as above states welcome to NEW AMBASSADOR

pretty clear to me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
1,962
Total visitors
2,135

Forum statistics

Threads
600,283
Messages
18,106,271
Members
230,993
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top