Thanks Gem2626
From that link, it gives me 2 thoughts, one is why bother going down this road, if it was simply part of a smokescreen as pointed out by the writer of that article?
My meaning is, much as I personally question the McCann thought process in many of their actions, they never publicised the Ward of Court move, so why would they do that as part of a smokescreen (unless maybe it was on a higher level)
Second thought is that it sends me back to thinking that the McCanns may have known of something regarding Madeleine being taken that has not been brought to our attention.
Going over old ground now, but just for a moment lets say that Madeleine was taken from the apartment and most, possibly all of the group had no prior knowledge of the abduction.
There is no doubt that Kate McCann in those early hours, portrayed a Mother who was in absolute hell, now that could be e genuine in that she had had her child taken, or it could be genuine in the fact that she was devasted by what had happened but for different, more selfish reasons.
If we take the thought that she/they believed it was a genuine abduction for a moment, then factor in the miraculous change exhibited by the Parents just days later, when I think they were visiting the church in PdL follow that with Gerry McCanns "wider agenda" and his "revelation" again in Church.
Suddenly, to me at least, the argument could be made that, they had been made aware of certain circumstances that changed their thinking and outlook.
Within this short period (2 weeks to apply to Court for a Wardship, from the date of MAdeleine going missing) we also had Gerry McCann stating that they would be looking for a big event, not in a year but on some anniversary or something, they were suddenly talking long term, why?
Possibly because they had knowledge that Madeleine was indeed safe, but not being returned for some unknown (to us) reason.
Again, all hypothetical bu, what if the UK police and peolple like BK were in the know as to this, it would suddenly make sense for the backing, rather than supporting a couple of Doctors who had covered up an accidental death or suchlike, that the support would be for a more supportive reason?