She was so unfeeling while she testified and I don't believe a thing she said relating to her "relationship" with Alex. Not a bit of remorse over Alex and especially what she did to him. None of what she said happened. He didn't cut her clothes, she did it herself after she attacked an unsuspecting Alex. I don't know what really happened, but it seems that she could have crawled into the back seat and stabbed him in the back of the head or neck while he was still sitting in the front with his back toward her to begin with. That was the beginning of the 16 stabs. What happened next is even more of a guess, but what I think she did after the attack is to thoughtfully take his cell phone. She grabbed it before she walked away from her crime, disabled it by breaking it and then tossed it on her way to safety. By doing that, she was making sure nobody found Alex anytime soon. She was making sure he wouldn't be found alive and before she could make up a story. That right there convinces me that she is guilty guilty guilty and calm enough to try to cover her tracks for the moment.
Hahaha, for real. I’m no pro but the objections from both sides are lacking. Just let the defense lead her wherever they want. I’m not defending EM but the state was relatively incoherent with questioning. I’m not saying it has to be exciting courtroom drama, but it has to be understood by the jury. I kept waiting for the big reveal but didn’t come.Defense attorney: "When you were talking to Detective Prock....and I know you have no independent memory so I'll show you the transcript...." Ezra: "YES, thank you..."
Total BS!!!!! She should not have been allowed to say that!
Right?!? Like enough with the journals. I’m pretty sure everyone understands she’s deceptive. There is honestly very little to no evidence of sexual assault at the scene. They could have shredded that part of her account.I’m baffled that the prosecution didn’t spend more time on the physical evidence of the crime scene and Ezra’s person!
How does the defense explain the other cuts on her arms? Parallel superficial cuts on her arms and legs that were never explained by the defense, OR brought up by the prosecution.
How about the crime scene, the position of his body, lack of blood on her, his shoes off and socks clean...
If I didn’t know any better, I would say it seems like the prosecution is throwing this case.
Unfortunately for Ezra her scheme fell apart when her car got stuck in the mud. I believe her original plan was to kill Alex and hide his body in a place where it wouldn't be found for a long time. The location of Alex's death fits the bill. It's isolated, it's over a hill and in a depression. It can't be seen from the road.
If her car had not gotten stuck in the mud she could have driven away and claimed that she and Alex had a friendly talk and she dropped him off at a store somewhere. Had that happened Alex would be a missing person not a homicide victim.
I find this quite interesting and hope it is mentioned by the State. Ezra told the detective that she recognized Mr. Sipple, the owner of the house that she went to. But, she claims she was never in that town or down that road. She had never been there and didn't even know where she was, yet Sipple's house was just five minutes away from where her car was. Had she been there before?
Does anyone know if EM ever has bail or if it was revoked? I keep wanting to see her brought in or out of the courtroom, clearly in custody, but I haven’t seen that yet. Maybe I’ve just missed those moments but haven’t seen it on CourtTV
Didn’t she state she took it so she could get help? I might be wrong but I remember thinking I wonder if she used it to dial 911 or any number. I hope they bring that up.
ETA: I agree she took it so he couldn’t call for help.
It’s been reported that she is being held on $250,000 bond.Does anyone know if EM ever has bail or if it was revoked? I keep wanting to see her brought in or out of the courtroom, clearly in custody, but I haven’t seen that yet. Maybe I’ve just missed those moments but haven’t seen it on CourtTV
They can be when read without context. When you consider his philosophic interest, these could be the musings of any number of philosophers. Philosophy is philosophy, it can be wordy and complex for even the simplest layman thoughts. I can’t wade too far into the philosophy water as my experience is limited to a 101 class a couple years ago maybe someone else on the thread has more significant experience.yikes, these journals of Alex's are a bit dark eh?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not usually but I'm hoping.I don't think you will get a different prosecutor with a mistrial.
Agree with all of that. It’s late so I suppose I have some time for some crazy talk lol. What if Jason had a larger role than what is thought. When he showed up to testify and EM saw him, she was giddy and smitten. What if he showed up at Alex’s house to make sure she didn’t get hurt in the act. But his roomie was there so they moved to plan B. Wasn’t it Jason that called the cops? The timing of him showing up, storming upstairs and the cops being there when they came down is curious. Did he have that much control over her? I know, I know, he’s not Manson. I’m just not sure she didn’t have some help. Annnndddd I’m done for the day. Catch y’all tomorrow!
Maybe Alex wrote whatever slur was found on the bathroom wall and that was her motive?