Jewels53
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 32,570
- Reaction score
- 47,506
I totally get where you’re coming from. The finish of the states cross today needs to be on point. There’s no question she did it but has the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn’t self defense? I don’t think they have. She has been prepped really well by her lawyers. She only got flustered a few times but bought herself time by asking for clarification on what was being asked.
No reference to cannibalism by Alex in any journal entries as she previously alluded to. She says it was in conversations with Alex only. Liar!! The State is destroying her previous testimony. Yes. Just more demonizing of Alex.
I'm just not sure this journal reading is doing that job. I find these journals so incredibly boring that I haven't paid close enough attention to catch the discrepancies I'm assuming he's trying to point out.
I'm totally not impressed with the examination by the prosecutor this morning. There is so much he could have asked that was not asked. I'm still wondering about the scarf around his neck. The timeline of events with the injuries could have been gone over to show that her story does not add up at all to show defense.
I surely hope that this prosecutor does not conduct the closing argument.
I'm beginning to think it would be better if there is a mistrial so that case can be retried with a different prosecutor.Horrible cross. I'm afraid she's going to walk.
I'm hoping for a mistrial with a different prosecutor.Horrible cross. I'm afraid she's going to walk.
I don't think you will get a different prosecutor with a mistrial.I'm hoping for a mistrial with a different prosecutor.