I think you misunderstood me regarding all this. I was honestly only commenting that I was concerned that no other leads had been mentioned or discussed. It's one thing for LE to not discuss what leads are, or any other indicators are, it's entirely another thing for there to be no discussion on their part regarding there actually being any other possibilities. Yes, KZ is a POI, but what about any other points that have been brought up, even in the general news?Above posts RSBM for focus..
Its easy to focus on him because of the other charges, but at the same time its ignoring other possibilities??..
Ummm, No, its not ignoring other possibilities..Just because we are discussing the fact that Kris Zocco is the only named POI does not in any way equal ignoring ALL OTHER POSSIBILITIES.. Kris Zocco at this point in time is the only named POI in Kelly's disappearance.. It does not mean that he is responsible, but it does leave him as an open, viable, and most significantly(for this convo) a "named" by LE, possible suspect/POI..
I have not seen anyone even allude to that somehow being indicative of automatic guilt.. What people are saying is that its definitely possible that he's involved... Other possibilities and avenues continue to be discussed as well.. And each of us are free to throw out as many possibilities as they want(so long as its within TOS) and discuss them as much, and for as long as they'd like..
Kris Zocco will continue to be discussed as a POI until he is ruled otherwise by LE..To discuss KZ as a POI does not mean that any/all other possibilities are being ignored..
------------------>>>>------------>>>>>
-->> Regarding all of the above issues that KZ was so honest and forthcoming with investigators and questioning why would a guilty man be admitting to so much??
Well, there is nothing at all indicative of KZ being this totally open book that you describe above wrt his being with Kelly.. You ask why would he even admit that she came home with him..why not just say she never even came home with him that night?..
I would say that its due to the fact that there were obvious issues that disallowed this known dishonest man from being completely dishonest about his contact with the victim.. Namely in the form of hard evidence such as the camera video footage we know exists.. Kinda hard to be a bold faced liar when faced with concrete evidence showing you and the missing victim together entering your apt.. How would even a liar lie about that?.. Pretty difficult when faced with proof positive of certain undeniable evidence of him with the victim..
Not to mention the fact that there are also witnesses that place Kris with the victim that night.. All major issues that would IMO make damn near impossible for the man to not admit to these issues that you make seem as tho, he opened up and was brazenly honest for his having nothing to hide.. I say to the contrary that its quite likely that the admissions were forced due to being faced with stone cold, hard evidence that disallowed for his to be dishonest about certain issues regarding Kelly.
-------------------->>>>>>> ----------->>>>>
-->>Regarding Kris Zocco having done something so stupid as to bring about such major attention on himself while knowing full well he was "running a known drug house" along with having built for himself quite a violent collection of toddler/baby *advertiser censored*.. So, why in the world would this man go and do something so stupid as "disappear"(aka murder/dispose of) a young woman without his having a decent alibi prepared???...???
Really, Samuke ?.. The fact that this man who runs a drug house and is into kiddie *advertiser censored* didn't make well thought out and rational decisions with a well prepared alibi to boot..this somehow makes it seem less likely that he is in any way involved in Kelly's "disappearance"??...
I'd say that the most likeliest scenario if Kris Zocco is indeed involved in Kelly's "disappearance" is that her death was NOT AT ALL, IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER planned and/or premeditated.. Just a hunch, but one that I'd definitely be willing to bet on if its found that KZ is involved.. IMO the fact that it wasn't planned or premeditated pretty much takes all of the above issue and throws it out the window wrt to the why, as in why would he do something knowing it'd bring great focus on him, his residence, and his lifestyle(which included drugs and child *advertiser censored*), without his having prepared a decent alibi???
IMO with just what tiny modicum we know about KZ I'd say, negative actions/behaviors breeding only more negative obstacles/hurdles which inevitably lead to only more serious/severe negative consequences for those actions/behaviors.. And so it goes in the sick cycle that rapidly picks up speed as it continues to deteriorate..accelerating into the death spiral at some point if not stopped or intervened.. IMO sadly Kelly got sucked into this madness by poor choices(no different than some of the poor choices that so very many of us made in our twenties, but lived to tell of it).. Whereas IMO if Kris is involved, I see it as Kelly's having had the grave misfortune of making some of those poor decisions/choices alongside someone whose own personal demons(as in KZ's own personal demons) ultimately cost Kelly her life..Jmo.
Regarding the honesty factor of KZ, I'm not saying he's being absolutely honest, I'm questioning why somebody with a habit of lying, who most definitely wouldn't want to draw attention to themselves (for obvious reasons) would admit to anything in the first place. The fact that he admitted she was even there over night the last anyone had seen her (especially if he knows nobody had seen her since) puts him at the very center of everything. Given the drugs in his house, not to mention the CP (that can land him 400 years prison time), you'd think the guy would want to avoid the attention of LE for any reason.
EDIT (for clarity): When I say questioning, I mean in a more "wondering out loud" sort of way. And from my understanding of KZ he's not a stupid person, and the person who mentioned having lived there said the only ground exits had cameras. It seems fairly obvious if he didn't cart her (or something possibly containing her) out the door or garage, that he was thinking of the cameras at some point (provided he did anything, of course). Think about it this way: the same thing that makes him a major POI (her not seen exiting the building in any way, shape, or form) would be exactly the reason he'd want to lie about it. If he did something, he knew enough not to walk past the cameras, which implies he has the sense to realize that the cameras are there (and so show her coming in). Yet he admits to the fact that she not only came in, but spent the night. He doesn't distance himself at all from that fact and (if responsible for anything) knowing full well there were cameras there that would likely be checked and not show her leaving.
I honestly have to say it seems to me the other way around. If you truly love somebody, and have a connection with them, you trust them entirely, and know they'd never do anything intentionally hurtful, and you feel secure, not just in your relationship, but in yourself and in your significant other. If there are any doubts, or distrust, or insecurities, if there's no absolute feeling of trust, then there is most definitely no real love there. JMHO.If this is true I am sorry that you have yet to meet someone with whom there is the wonderfully beautiful, deep and connected feeling of being "in love" with someone.. mind, body, and soul(and experiencing their being "in love" with you..mind, body, and soul)..