Calliope
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
- Messages
- 6,534
- Reaction score
- 76
Ok, now I'm more confused... but thanks, will read it a few more time.
Sounds as if the prosecutor brings his evidence against a specific person. If the GJ believes a crime has been committed, they indorse the indictment. If they feel something's wrong but aren't sure what crime occurred (or if the suspect can be charged), they present their question to the Court for direction. I could well be misreading that altogether lol. But after reading that section, it seems to me the prosecutor must have a person they are going after specifically to be indicted on specific charges. It doesn't read as though it can be used to compel people to talk just to collect evidence without a specific suspect in mind (did that make sense?) JMO of course.