That's what I keep coming back to in my mind. If these docs are about an investigation of witness or evidence tampering by LB, then how or why is Brad Conway involved? Why would LE be looking towards him for information regarding this. He is not a party to either TES, the actual KC case nor any of the searchers or investigators.
BUT, If LE is casting a broader tampering net. If they do not believe that the tampering originated as an issolated incident performed by a lone loony (LB) but rather are suspecting a repeated patern of tampering or questionable behavior, than how would that look. The only real reason I can see them digging for info from BC, and the only real reason that I can see BC bailing from the A's the way that he did, was he was finding himself in the middle of something unethical. Note he was not returning JB's letters. Something that was being asked of him made him opt to not respond. I really think that LE is truly looking at Mr. Baez in this, with a dash of Mason thrown in.
I mean yeah we can speculate that maybe LE learned something from LB that pointed to CA. But really what could that possibly be? We know CA didn't fill out the form. And CA is not a direct party to the case. She is under no ethical restrictions. All she needs to say is, "yes I met and talked to LB before she was added to anyones witness lists. I discussed my daughters case with her, and told her my opinions and thoughts on it all". Unless she as a private citizen offered to pay LB for testimony or threatened or blackmailed her, there simply is no case to be made against CA in this one.
The tone of those forms and the highlighted defense filings really make me think that LE at the very least have been taking a very deep look at some of JB's out of court antics. We keep saying that JB does not seem to know or care what the typical boundaries of professional conduct, behavior and performance are for a lawyer before the court. He seems to make up and follow his own rules (much like his client). We have witnessed him do and say things that bring utter shock to our legal professionals. Why would we at this point assume that he is not playing as fast and loose with those same rules outside the courtroom? I'm betting that LE may have had some interesting conversations with DC and with Mort. But we will not be seeing any documents of that as they are separate investigations unrelated to Caylee Anthony, and are related to criminal investigations in which charges have not yet been filed.
(for our legal types, If they did have an active investigation of JB or CM or a defense principle, at what point would they have to inform the judge? And when informing him woul dit have to take the form of a public filing? Or because of its nature is it something that could go in in a form that would not be recognized or released?)