Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For these reasons, statistics on filicide aren't really applicable in this case, in the sense that 'if a child is found dead in the home..." Its what RDI grasps at in the absense of hard evidence.
"I couldn't kill my kid (I THINK), so they couldn't either".This is not what I think.This is not my argument,,dunno about others.
And re what Walker said,I guess we are all well aware that SOME people are capable of such things but maybe the people he is talking about had a background.
I just wanted to know what makes you think that THESE two people were capable of this.What actions of theirs,what part of their behavior.Cause you are the one giving me this line "if everybody is capable of it,the R's were too".It's the same kind of argument you accuse others of using.
The problem with that assertion is that this "BS" argument has an awful lot of real heavy hitters behind it. Don't kill the messenger.
Boulder Police Chief Tom Koby
"The person who did this is living in hell right now because no matter what happens, they know they did something terrible and extremely violent."
http://web.dailycamera.com/extra/ramsey/1997/12/28-3.html
IMO BOTH McCrary and Douglas are actually saying the same thing.
It was someone who knew JB,knew the house&the family.No stranger.
OK but what of the things that this person knew could've been learned simply by being there that afternoon? I mean, they would learn the layout of the house, they could listen to messages, read mail, read notes on the desk, etc., etc.
Nah.
According to JR, the person who did this is 'an evil person beyond imagination'. According to top experts, the nature of the crime suggests zero remorse, someone who had intent to harm and kill a small child.
In my view this is true because this person further wrote about the execution beheading a small child, a concept without precedent on a global scale. Further, those who have been known to mix ideology with their crimes don't display remorse or act like they've done something terrible or are guilt ridden. Manson and Kaczynski come to mind.
Anyway, it would seem at this point that JR is actually better at characterizing crime than the BPD chief.
IMO BOTH McCrary and Douglas are actually saying the same thing.
It was someone who knew JB,knew the house&the family.No stranger.
"I couldn't kill my kid (I THINK), so they couldn't either".This is not what I think.This is not my argument,,dunno about others.
And re what Walker said,I guess we are all well aware that SOME people are capable of such things but maybe the people he is talking about had a background.
I just wanted to know what makes you think that THESE two people were capable of this.What actions of theirs,what part of their behavior.Cause you are the one giving me this line "if everybody is capable of it,the R's were too".It's the same kind of argument you accuse others of using.
If I personally wouldn't do it that doesn't mean that the R's didn't.But WHAT makes you think that they did?I mean,you must base this argument on something,what is it.
Everybody is capable of this is not an answer and this poll shows it.
So what is it that makes you think that these two were capable of such things. There's nothing in their background
and I am sure you agree LE did everything in their power to find out the R's dirty/creepy secrets.
More:
McCrary described JonBenet's killer as calculating and manipulative.
"He may have quickly constructed an alibi, but I don't ... think he'd rehearse it, because he's a very self-confident guy to create this kind of staging (with the ransom note)," McCrary said. "This is someone who is glib, who has superficial charm but ultimately is very cold blooded."
http://web.dailycamera.com/extra/ramsey/1997/07/24-2.html
cold blooded person
no remorse
doing extremely violent things
What makes you think the R's FIT?
Ugh, I haven't been to this thread in awhile, people still think the R's are innocent? I would think the average person should be able to realize they are not just by knowing the basics of the case, but come on, the ransom note? People actually read that and still think that they R's are not guilty? If it weren't so sad it would be funny.