You are attributing your own set of motives to her actions. Let's be very clear about that. ( whistling in the dark comes to mind here).
Wrongful Death Suit filed Nov. 13, 2013 in California, #2
- Thread starter Salem
- Start date
Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread
- Status
You are attributing your own set of motives to her actions. Let's be very clear about that. ( whistling in the dark comes to mind here).
screecher
"Dina is going to kill me!"
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,699
- Reaction score
- 18
so you've watched the video?
wait...did the housemaid really do that? also, did the housemaid pound her head with something. tia
Lulu2, No, I don't know Rebecca (or anyone in all of South Korea) mimicked the suicide of a character in a vintage, foreign language movie (remade at least 8 times in different cultural genres....Danish, Japanese, American, French etc) with subtitles about older men who can't seem to keep their pants on when a young girl without economic means moves into the household. However, I believe, YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE THE FILM IS RELEVANT.
South Korean "rubber shoe and handkerchief" movies are just boiler plate soap operas and the theme of over half the movies produced after the Korean War.
YOU KNOW.... the Korean War, 38th parallel in the 1950's? If I were to believe the soap opera of the Housemaid was relevant, then I would also have to believe that M.A.S.H. was also a true depiction of American medical field during the Korean War. Bulletin: it ain't so LULU2.....it is just make believe theater. Lulu2, it is OK if you disagree with me. And as a gesture of my willingness to accept criticism, I would gladly encourage you to binge watch all the over-acted
S Korean films, for a week....I'll supply the popcorn and handkerchiefs at my own expense. Lulu2, I read and feel your beliefs...I get it.
LuckyLucy2
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,506
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes, she really has the noose over her hair. No, IIRC, she did not "pound her head with something", but neither did Rebecca.
LuckyLucy2
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,506
- Reaction score
- 0
No, I'm agreeing with what the SDSO, FBI, and DOJ found. Not my own "set of motives".
LuckyLucy2
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,506
- Reaction score
- 0
Yes, facts. And it's a FACT that the woman in THE HOUSEMAID hangs herself with her hair under the noose. And it's a FACT that the movie was taken in as evidence by the detectives.
LuckyLucy2
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 1,506
- Reaction score
- 0
None of the above makes any sense to me. The dectectives did not take M.A.S.H. or the entire history of Korean Film as evidence. Just The Housemaid, the movie that shows a woman hanging herself with her hair UNDER the noose. A movie that Rebecca and Jonah must have owned and watched.
inthedark14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,824
- Reaction score
- 38
Can someone remind me which warrant shows that video taken into evidence?
TIA
TIA
screecher
"Dina is going to kill me!"
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,699
- Reaction score
- 18
Ah, I see. You didn't answer the question...have you watched the video?
*Lash*
Justice 4 Rebecca
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction score
- 67
It's easy to assume a jury would be shown pictures of Rebecca Zahau's alleged suicide. Especially the pictures of the overturned chair and red dog bone. The room SDSO stated showed no signs of struggle. A jury would most likely see the list of items taken into evidence, which did not include the chair or the dog bone. In my opinion, a reasonable jury will look closely at the pictures and after hearing about the 4 injuries to her head wonder why the big red dog bone was not seized nor tested. A jury may even be as curious as to how the detectives determined so early in the investigation the chair and dog bone were not pertinent pieces of evidence. As well, it's feasible a jury might be curious to why panties found in a guesthouse of a defendant who admitted viewing *advertiser censored* before allegedly discovering a woman hanging nude were not tested. I think the Zahau attorneys would also delve into how gloves taken into evidence could be missing DNA. I can only assume the plaintiffs might then call an expert on Confirmation Bias. The expert might explain how decision makers have been shown to actively seek out and assign weight to evidence that confirms their theory, and ignore evidence that could disconfirm their theory. Otherwise known as Selection Bias. JMO.
*Lash*
Justice 4 Rebecca
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction score
- 67
Rebecca's Case #41227 - http://ftpcontent.worldnow.com/kfmb/misc/warrant_41227.pdf
ETA - The movie The Housemaid is not listed anywhere in the warrant. It was mentioned only in Rule's book.
Thanks for reminding of how STOOOPIDly odd the SDSO investigation was from the very start@! A silly South Korean cinematic soap opera is TAKEN INTO EVIDENCE....But, for 30 days NO ONE felt it was relevant to retrieve the messages on Rebecca's phone???? Oh yah, oh yah, oh yah...and they also photographed the pink Coach w-r-i-s-t-l-e-t........
What "lulu explanation" do you have for failing to retrieve critical phone info in a timely manner? (I just gotta hear this one, too.)
inthedark14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,824
- Reaction score
- 38
Thanks Lash! I'm probably being dense, but I'm not seeing the video on the receipt/inventory of items. Can someone please point it out to me?
screecher
"Dina is going to kill me!"
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,699
- Reaction score
- 18
Bolded red by me
How do you know this? Or is it just skewed thinking? Please provide a link proving this. tia
ETA: ahh, thanks *Lash* for once again clarifying yet again a post made to sound as FACT.
C'mon, Lulu2. Why was RZ quiet? Perhaps she was sad and concentrating on doing what she could to help Jonah. Her diary entries? Her sister said they had been written months earlier ( do I remember her saying they were 6 months old?). Boarded the dog? There was a lot of activity going on and she was gone a lot. Maybe Jonah asked her to. Sending her sister home? Vacation was clearly over once Max got hurt.
You are absolutely attributing motives to RZ and stating vehemently that YOUR assumptions about her motivations prove her guilty. Sometimes I think that a bunch of stuff gets thrown against the wall to see what will stick.
MOO
K_Z
Verified Anesthetist
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,657
- Reaction score
- 2,499
So, it occurs to me, how long exactly would a home security company keep detailed records for a particular property? After all, it's been 3 years since Rebecca's death, and the mansion underwent extensive renovations. It actually doesn't seem reasonable to me that ADT would even still have detailed records on the system in place back in 2011. Why? It doesn't have the same significance as a medical record, or financial documents, etc, so why would a security company keep detailed records years on a specific property? That would take a ton of servers and storage space. I could see that maybe they have records that the Spreckles property was a client, and maybe locations of the original system, and payment records-- but individual records of every time the alarm may have blipped?
I have a call into our company to see how long they keep records.
Here's item #101 and 102 from the San Diego ROA. Dina's motion to compel ADT's records on Spreckles.
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/face..._Motion_to_Compel_Discovery_1424636558401.pdf
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/face...OA-102_02-19-15_Order_Other_1424636559714.pdf
I can't copy/ paste the request from the subpoena in the document above (page 7 of 18), but they are asking for all records of everything (including smoke and carbon monoxide detectors) for the period 1 Aug 2010 to 1 Aug 2011.
- Status