WV WV - Aliayah Lunsford, 3, Lewis Co., 24 Sep 2011 - # 8

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Those twins must be coming soon.

I hope we hear something soon.
 
I don't guess LL has had the twins........... I don't think she will talk when she has the twins but at least it gives LE a shot at it. She might go for a "deal". Never know. I just hope and pray she does tell where Aliayah is and what happened to her. I don't believe she doesn't know anything or that Aliayah was taken.

I don't understand why there is no media coverage of RL. Where is he and what is he doing? Why hasn't he been interviewed or even filmed? Why does he seen to be off-limits?

Aliayah wasn't his and she's the one who is gone. I don't know if the other children showed signs of abuse or not. I hope not but I'd bet they do.

I wonder if the father of child #3 has taken custody of his son?


moo

I think the father of the male 5 year old, was arrested last week and is in jail.
 
I wish they would have kept her locked up for selling her food stamp card.
That would have made easier for them to remove them as soon as they are born.I am devastated that she has been gone for a month now. I also do not understand how any mother could not be out in public begging for her daughter to be found,plus I would be screaming about losing my other children.

I agree with you, but if there is no media camera around, no reporters there to record it, how do we know they aren't? (I'm referring to all the parents of missing, not just this one.) I have seen very little coverage of this little missing girl, yet there are segments covering baby Lisa's case all day long, every day.
I read cases on here that I have never seen on any news network. I know they can't cover every one of them, there are so many, but some of them do not get any national coverage at all and very little local coverage, from what I hear. Why do some cases attract more media and others don't?
 
This is my speculation: They were playing good cop with her. The house was probably really bad, the state gave them so much time to get it cleaned up. LE offered to put them in a hotel while that is done. I think they never even tried to clean up the house or did a bad job, officials came in to inspect and deemed the house was still not in the condition for the children so CPS took them.

Well, how exactly are they supposed to get the house cleaned up if they're not there, they're in a hotel? LE sure isn't going to pay a maid service to do it. Could it be they got them out of the house long enough to do a thorough search like they did in Lisa's case?
Removing the children because of bad living conditions is not a quick process, it requires going through a judge. In most places, they don't remove children that quickly unless their lives are in imminent danger. I would bet CPS was getting the paperwork done and things in order while the family was in the hotel.
 
The reasons and timing for the childrens' removal will be clearer once charges are laid down regarding Aliayah's disappearance. Til then all we can do is speculate. I do think the children being removed is directly related to something found when searching the home. Whatever that was, coupled with Aliayah's disappearance gave LE and DHS the reasonable belief that the others were or could be in imminent danger. That is my take on it. What was found that led them to that belief, I think we will eventually hear as I feel it will directly relate to what LE feels truly happened with Aliayah.
 
is it possible the family was moved to the hotel just because of the sheer size of the family, in comparison to the size of the home.. I always figured that to be the case and that it would probably be hard for LE to search the home with people breathing down their necks... plus having to wrangle all those kids and keep them out of LE's hair
 
I certainly hope charges are coming soon. I know that it is harder without a body. I really expected them to break by now. More and more lately the ones I think will break down and spill the beans are not doing so.
 
"A year later, unemployed, struggling to make ends meet and no longer able to care for the ten children they had together, the 34-year-old Nebraska father made a drastic, and shocking, decision.

While his 18-year-old daughter was out at work, he rounded up his nine other children aged one to 17, putting some in the car and instructing others to take a bus and meet him at Creighton University Medical Centre, a hospital in Omaha.

There he found a staff member, told them that he was abandoning his family under the state's new Safe Haven law, and walked away. "

I'll tell you the one thing that pisses me off about this story, is that considering that the father was only 34 years old, you can BET he has already now started spreading his sperm around to make a new family somewhere. These "safe havens" should also stipulate that a vasectomy or tube-tying is part of the package of being able to dump off a family.


CBM. Respectfully, I couldn't disagree more. Safe Haven laws were designed for those who are fearful and have hidden their pregnancy to have a safe place to drop off a newborn no questions asked. If what you suggest, tubal ligation or vasectomy, were required we'd see an enormous increase in abandoned deceased newborns. I doubt anyone wants that.

Besides, the loophole in that NE law has already been corrected.

My apologies for the OT. I simply couldn't pass this comment and not reply. Now back to Aliayah. Where are you sweetie?
 
This must be the longest pregnancy with multiples in the world.
 
Is the mother still in jail? (I haven't checked in on this case in a few days, sorry).
 
I hope the twins come soon and are healthy. Aliayah, where are you honey?
 
I'll tell you the one thing that pisses me off about this story, is that considering that the father was only 34 years old, you can BET he has already now started spreading his sperm around to make a new family somewhere. These "safe havens" should also stipulate that a vasectomy or tube-tying is part of the package of being able to dump off a family.

IIRC a year later he had a girlfriend who was pregnant.IMO he shirked his responsibility of all those kids to start all over again with a younger woman.Their mom dies then he abandoned them,great guy NOT!:furious:

Edit to add Father Who Ditched Nine Kids Via Safe Haven Law Has Twins on the Way

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529597,00.html#ixzz1bfASAqYC
 
Praying every day and night that you will be found.
 
IIRC a year later he had a girlfriend who was pregnant.IMO he shirked his responsibility of all those kids to start all over again with a younger woman.Their mom dies then he abandoned them,great guy NOT!:furious:

Edit to add Father Who Ditched Nine Kids Via Safe Haven Law Has Twins on the Way

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529597,00.html#ixzz1bfASAqYC



Respectfully. There is a thread for this case here:

Man Who Ditches 9 Children Under Safe Haven Law Is Going to Be A father Again! - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

Let's please leave this thread for Aliayah. thank you :blowkiss:
 
IIRC a year later he had a girlfriend who was pregnant.IMO he shirked his responsibility of all those kids to start all over again with a younger woman.Their mom dies then he abandoned them,great guy NOT!:furious:

Edit to add Father Who Ditched Nine Kids Via Safe Haven Law Has Twins on the Way

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529597,00.html#ixzz1bfASAqYC

OMG! Are you kidding me? Cubby, I do understand your point though about the "safe haven" thing, but still it sickens me that people can and DO dump their kids, only to keep the baby-making machine going.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
195
Guests online
273
Total visitors
468

Forum statistics

Threads
609,358
Messages
18,253,179
Members
234,639
Latest member
bratz.susan28
Back
Top