An interesting read in its entirety. The reason Bertolino released the statement is because the crowds were growing in size and anger was escalating. Bertolino wanted to do a press conference and the FBI if they did so, they would arrest Roberta. So, he released the statement with the sincere hope the Petito family understood they were concerned and cared about what GP's family was going through.Post, in its entirety, by @Sundog:
"The Laundries were ill-served, IMO, by their attorney who chose to release the statement in the way that he did. I think they trusted his judgement on what to write and release in his statement."
This ^ post is included in post below by @MyBelle.
@MyBelle
Tho understanding that some ppl "protested" at or close to the Laundrie home (I don't recall details), I'm not following the gist of the post.
Is ^post saying that the L's atty's publicly released stmt at that time was the (or an) appropriate way to address the circumstances, i.e., to prevent ppl from "protesting?"
Or to address something else?
ETA. TYVM for link to depo of Bertolino
Now starting to read it for more context & timing re the publicly released stmt & the protests. May clarify the issue.
Deposition (150+ pgs.) is linked in this story:
Former Laundrie attorney defends actions, notes that Roberta Laundrie could have faced arrest
In the depositions released earlier this week in the civil trial against the parents of Brian Laundrie, Steven Bertolino defended his actions in the days following Gabby Petito’s disappearance.www.mysuncoast.com
On page 109-110, he said that Rick Stafford (a Petito family attorney) told him that somebody on "his side" wanted the Laundries and Bertolino dead and it was growing increasingly difficult for Stafford to restrain whoever wanted them dead. Bertolino asked him to please consider what the Laundries were going through. They were being accused of helping Brian flee the country and death threats were pouring in. Bertolino, his staff, his daughters were also receiving death threats.
JMO