Generally alligators that are suspected of killing a person are trapped by FWC officials, euthanized, and then examined.Maybe they think he’s in an alligator and the rifles are to catch it..!
JMO.
Or so they say...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Generally alligators that are suspected of killing a person are trapped by FWC officials, euthanized, and then examined.Maybe they think he’s in an alligator and the rifles are to catch it..!
JMO.
I don't live in a swamp/preserve area, but when we used to go hiking in the desert we went armed. I also live in a border state, that only added to our wanting to be armed. JMOAre you saying that almost every person who hikes in the nature preserves carry weapons of some kind? When I've read of deaths in nature preserves and national parks it's usually because of falls and unpreparedness (not checking the weather, not advising people where they are going, wrong gear, etc) not from encountering wild animals. Sure, they do happen, but most of those encounters I've seen with alligators are in areas that people are very familiar with like waterways near their homes. Even in Disneyworld a child was killed by an alligator. Even panther attacks are almost none existent.
It's hard for me to envision that the majority of hikers and campers carry weapons.
I second that hmmm.
I think we are assuming that he was at the house when the calls were received. He may well have been out of the house and out of immediate contact with his family.
He has been their attorney for 20 years, they flipped houses, I assume he mostly helped with real estate but IDK so definitely not a new occurrence. When they actually made the phone call is irrelevant to me, they could have very well called after LE left. The resulting action of telling LE we will only communicate thru him is the same whenever they contacted him. The point is they had their wits about them. MOOSee to me, I'm not certain that they at that point in time "contacted their attorney". I think personal stories are taboo, so I'll just say there are people that utilize an attorney on an ongoing manner... typically business owners, for example. They may very likely have their attorneys business card(s) on hand. So, were someone to comes to the door and express something that may sound ominous, they may just jump to action to refer the person to the attorney. I'd imagine that if I walked into Boeing and started asking serious legal type questions, I'd get referred to Counsel... no matter if there was guilt or not. Yes, I know that's not a 1:1 analogy, but the concept is still there.
And LE had a missing person who lived in that house, and her automobile was there. Anyway the post was about what would happen if ppl just refused to talk to the cops. As I said, they had empirical evidence of his traffic violations, AND they had conflicting stories about DV from witnesses. So, anyone else in a different neighborhood would (likely, IMO) have been hauled in on the unequivocal, empirically detailed traffic violations while the whole thing was sorted out.They had witnesses of the DV tho don't forget.
ExactlyFirst thing I’d do is talk to my son. BL was right there in that not so big house. I suspect getting the attorney had a lot to do with his response.
Yes, plus, where else was he really supposed to go? I mean, he could have turned himself in, but if not, what other options did he have?Seems kind of pointless to have your own place if your plan is to save up enough money to travel the US in a van. Sure, they had some nice items along with them on the trip, but neither really seemed to require a lot of material items. I think living at home was a means to achieve that traveling plan. If I was planning to leave for an extended period of time, I wouldn't want to be locked into a lease or deal with monthly maintenance of a home. Sure, you can sublet, if allowed, or rent out your own home, but those come with their own risks that young 20 somethings probably don't want.
IMO, where he lived doesn't really say much. Returning there after potentially committing a crime, however, does. He could have been looking for comfort and stability, especially if he was supposed to be on medication for anxiety.
Edited spelling, again. No one wants to travel in a can.
I've seen nothing that compels me that Laundrie was considered a freeloader. Possibly, for example, his parents asked him to remain at their home ('cuz it;s their business location too) to help in the family business. Maybe they paid him, maybe it was in exchange for room and board. I don;t know whatsoever. But its hard for me to simply look though a tiny tiny peephole and see the entire scene. Maybe others can? If the IP stuff is real, then yeah, that sucks big time. were there any C&D letters involved. Did he pay license fees? Did he profit from that alleged situation? I don't know.I haven't done any of these things. I don't think living at home contemptible. (But freeloading is.) Actually, stealing intellectual property is contemptible. (Any real artist will attest to this.) So I take that back. I have said that now. And as far as reading, I'm happy to see young people reading as a hobby and will not judge anyone for that.
What do you think it means?I second that hmmm.
Exactly!Are you saying that almost every person who hikes in the nature preserves carry weapons of some kind? When I've read of deaths in nature preserves and national parks it's usually because of falls and unpreparedness (not checking the weather, not advising people where they are going, wrong gear, etc) not from encountering wild animals. Sure, they do happen, but most of those encounters I've seen with alligators are in areas that people are very familiar with like waterways near their homes. Even in Disneyworld a child was killed by an alligator. Even panther attacks are almost none existent.
It's hard for me to envision that the majority of hikers and campers carry weapons.
And LE had a missing person who lived in that house, and her automobile was there. Anyway the post was about what would happen if ppl just refused to talk to the cops. As I said, they had empirical evidence of his traffic violations, AND they had conflicting stories about DV from witnesses. So, anyone else in a different neighborhood would have been hauled in on the unequivocal, empirically detailed traffic violations while the whole thing was sorted out.
IMO
Just like @TheGardener said, I also believe that the hitchhike, bike ride etc were all alibi thing. They didn't expect her to be found so early. That one thought makes me puke.
He will still need somone's help and if the Laundries are in constant supervision, who is helping him?
I don't care what they do t him if they find him.Judging from comments I've read in these threads, some people are "praying" that he is found alive for the purpose of seeing to it that he is EXECUTED in the name of the people of the United States, considering THAT homicide as justifiable. I do not want anyone to be executed in my name. This is my opinion. jmo
Are you saying that almost every person who hikes in the nature preserves carry weapons of some kind? When I've read of deaths in nature preserves and national parks it's usually because of falls and unpreparedness (not checking the weather, not advising people where they are going, wrong gear, etc) not from encountering wild animals. Sure, they do happen, but most of those encounters I've seen with alligators are in areas that people are very familiar with like waterways near their homes. Even in Disneyworld a child was killed by an alligator. Even panther attacks are almost none existent.
It's hard for me to envision that the majority of hikers and campers carry weapons.
I've seen nothing that compels me that Laundrie was considered a freeloader. Possibly, for example, his parents asked him to remain at their home ('cuz it;s their business location too) to help in the family business. Maybe they paid him, maybe it was in exchange for room and board. I don;t know whatsoever. But its hard for me to simply look though a tiny tiny peephole and see the entire scene. Maybe others can? If the IP stuff is real, then yeah, that sucks big time. were there any C&D letters involved. Did he pay license fees? Did he profit from that alleged situation? I don't know.