10ofRods
Verified Anthropologist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,559
- Reaction score
- 194,955
Mom and Dad not saying anything seems wrong to the average person, but it can be explained that BL told them he needed to talk to a lawyer, the parents connected him with SB who advised both BL and his parents to say nothing to anyone, and that's what they did: followed the advice of their attorney. This doesn't have to make BL or the parents look guilty of anything, nor should it to a jury. To everyone on this forum, sure. We can have all the opinions and gut feelings in the world.
The cell phone data will be interesting. It could trip BL up in a statement he made, but - - he never made a statement which leaves a lot of wiggle room to explain whatever turns up as far as location data of where the phones were when.
If that Yosemite text to Gabby's mom was sent from Gabby's phone while BL was no where near a living Gabby, I think that's a good piece of circumstantial evidence. Same with the Stan texts. The texts would only go through when there *was* service, obviously.
So, if the phone travels out of Spread Creek at any point past the 29th, that's not good for BL, as Gabby never left. If her phone wasn't found right next to her, someone caused it to move elsewhere. And that would be true if her death was on the 27th - but the exact day of death wouldn't matter. It's the fact that she was murdered and then her body was left (while her phone was taken and used) that would matter.
Of course, there will also be pings and text and call records, IMO - lots of digital evidence in this one. Most like use of CC at gas stations, too. He didn't care - he brazenly went to an ATM or made a purchase where he could take out goods and cash totaling more than $1000 after Gabby was dead.
Expounding on your well thought out post, but what if
the search continues in the reserve, because of some 'perceived' possible planted evidence? I am not saying by whom, but clearly the assistance and "help" that Mr Laundrie was able to provide last week caught my curiosity.
Then Big Yikes. Yikes. If I let my mind go that way, I can think of ALL kinds of ways that accomplices could make it look as if BL had been in the Preserve.
I wonder if on one of the search warrant visits to the Laundrie house (the one where they went in the camper) they were also looking for articles with the scent of the two parents. What if the reason ChL "cooperated" is because they said they traced a recent scent of his to that campsite area.
There would be so many false clues an accomplice could leave. What a terrible mess for LE.
I'm kind of doubting it. but something does seem to be making LE go back again and again to the preserve. Was it mostly NPPD this last time?
And the worst part is that Gabby's family may never get a chance for Justice. Let's pray it's not the case.