Zach Adams on trial for the kidnapping and murder of Holly Bobo Sept 20 & 21, 2017

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
[video=twitter;910857575251443714]https://twitter.com/WSMVCarley/status/910857575251443714[/video]
 
Henry2326 said:
Do you believe he had nothing to do with this?
Click to expand...

I think the evidence is weak, objectively. It's all dependent on random he-said she-said comments made over the years, plus the testimony of a guy who could have done it himself and is being bribed by the state to testify against ZA.

Otherwise, it's just junk trying to be passed off as pointing at ZA when it really doesn't implicate him any more than thousands of others. They can tie a gun - some random gun - to ZA, but no idea whether it was The Gun (can't even say for sure if it was the right caliber), and their best testimony about a gunshot is that the witness says he and others thought she was already dead before she was shot (which legally might even make the gunshot irrelevant, because it's not murder to shoot a corpse). The cell phone evidence is pretty much junk and proves nothing - it indicates incredibly broad areas so the "margin of error" is too great for it to be indicative of the specificity in location they needed. There was HB "stuff" strewn lots of places, pointing to no one in particular. Nothing whatsoever found on either SA property or ZA property. SA was supposedly being creepy at a coon hunt days before (which isn't a crime, and which doesn't pertain to ZA anyhow). The fact that there may have been a burn barrel, in an area where probably every property has one, was a worthless assertion.

So it all falls on the reliability of the testimony of a guy (JA) who by his own admission is trying to please the state in what he says on the stand, who is bribing him to testify, and who was provided access to all the state's evidence in advance, to be able to tailor his answers to fit. If he had testified without knowing the coming testimony of others, or if there was PRIMARY evidence to confirm some of what he said, then I could give him greater weight. In that context, the fact that he was well-rehearsed, very polished, is probably NOT telling us what it would seem, because it may mean they drilled him until he had it down pat, because he was really the state's case.

As I've said earlier, if I was on the jury, it's not been proven BARD to me, because I have so many question-marks about the evidence and about JA the Paid Witness really being the only "proof" of anything, but I would probably vote guilty anyhow to something (I know that's not how it's supposed to work, but I couldn't vote to let ZA walk) but would have to be sure there is no DP.
 
Harmony2 said:
Thanks for the clarification. Cory Rivers reported what Zach stated to him. Zach could have been posturing to make an impression on Cory.
Click to expand...

Yes but I still can't get over animals taking off with the most delicate of bones.

A hand for instance barely has meat on it. Animals do not have fingers to separate bone from meat. If truly she was not dismembered, something would have been left.

It doesn't take science to prove this to me.

It would take science to prove to me she was not dismembered. Not one bone below the waist and no arms/hand/wrists....even shoulders.....nothing found in the excavated dens other than maybe one of the ribs.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
minor4th said:
I was just listening to a local reporter on Lawnewz - and he said people in the community think Clint knows more than he has said. Not that he was involved, but he knows more. He said even the investigators and prosecutors believe that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

Yes, even one of the prosecution's investigators admitted yesterday that Clint 'changed his story several times'. Or maybe he said a few times---I can't remember---but he definitely said he changed his story which caused them to continue to look at him.
 
Oh this guy on Lawnewz said that Shayne did tell law Enforcement about the kidnapping and rape, implicating himself, Zach and Dylan.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
[video=twitter;910858214752882688]https://twitter.com/NC5_ChrisConte/status/910858214752882688[/video]

[video=twitter;910858142472445953]https://twitter.com/FOX13Memphis/status/910858142472445953[/video]
 
Does anyone know how many hours it is until they are next in court today.
 
[video=twitter;910859187072258048]https://twitter.com/NC5_ChrisConte/status/910859187072258048[/video]
 
SteveS said:
I

As I've said earlier, if I was on the jury, it's not been proven BARD to me, because I have so many question-marks about the evidence and about JA the Paid Witness really being the only "proof" of anything, but I would probably vote guilty anyhow to something (I know that's not how it's supposed to work, but I couldn't vote to let ZA walk) but would have to be sure there is no DP.
Click to expand...

Ditto...I'm not favorable to the death penalty in any case for all the reasons you listed. If I was on jury, all 3 would be behind bars.

In the end, all the ifs, buts, and howevers that we discuss here really do not matter. The totality of the evidence will have an impact.

Sent from my VK815 using Tapatalk
 
If the ADA in closing, and the Judge in his instructions clearly states the 'acting in concert' law.... he will be convicted as he should be. It is a very simple concept and surely the jury will be able to grasp it.

I don't see any reason why they wouldn't understand it. It isn't like they have never heard of more than one defendant being charged/tried and found guilty of acting in concert during the felonies they all committed together. Acting in concert under the law means all participants are equally guilty and it is an easy law/rule to understand. They will be able to take the jury instructions back to the deliberation room.

Justice for Holly!
 
Per N&N on channel 5 - ZA is wearing suits that belong to J. Thompson's husband. I had heard them say this before. And he is also wearing makeup to cover up the dark circles under his eyes - (maybe to make him look less scary to the jury??)
 
[video=twitter;910859692590673922]https://twitter.com/burtstaggsnews/status/910859692590673922[/video]

[video=twitter;910859735095824384]https://twitter.com/SashaJonesWMC/status/910859735095824384[/video]

[video=twitter;910859830574944258]https://twitter.com/WSMVCarley/status/910859830574944258[/video]
 
[video=twitter;910860057151143936]https://twitter.com/MarandaFaris/status/910860057151143936[/video]

[video=twitter;910860045021302784]https://twitter.com/WSMVCarley/status/910860045021302784[/video]

[video=twitter;910860261250256897]https://twitter.com/bchapman_WREG3/status/910860261250256897[/video]
 
Henry2326 said:
Ditto...I'm not favorable to the death penalty in any case for all the reasons you listed. If I was on jury, all 3 would be behind bars.

In the end, all the ifs, buts, and howevers that we discuss here really do not matter. The totality of the evidence will have an impact.

Sent from my VK815 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Same. I don't think I could ever give anyone the death penalty, but I would definitely find Zach guilty of kidnapping and murder - not as sure about rape, it depends on the law and jury instructions.
 
minor4th said:
Oh this guy on Lawnewz said that Shayne did tell law Enforcement about the kidnapping and rape, implicating himself, Zach and Dylan.
Click to expand...

Unless he has info that we haven't heard before, this isn't accurate. I've been following this case for years, and we had the statements offered by SA, and in them he never admitted (in fact, vehemently denied) any involvement except in the disposal of the body. In fact, his plea deal was based on his claim of no involvement. His atty after his death continued to say the same thing, on his behalf.
 
[video=twitter;910860201489727489]https://twitter.com/NC5_ChrisConte/status/910860201489727489[/video]

[video=twitter;910860895454208000]https://twitter.com/burtstaggsnews/status/910860895454208000[/video]

[video=twitter;910860752692613120]https://twitter.com/NC5_ChrisConte/status/910860752692613120[/video]
 
[video=twitter;910860700892921856]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910860700892921856[/video]

[video=twitter;910861617855893504]https://twitter.com/MarandaFaris/status/910861617855893504[/video]
 
minor4th said:
I was just listening to a local reporter on Lawnewz - and he said people in the community think Clint knows more than he has said. Not that he was involved, but he knows more. He said even the investigators and prosecutors believe that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

That has been said for 6 years now yet Clint has been to every hearing in support of his sister and during the trial itself. He has been interviewed by the investigators over and over again.

I think some are just determined to make more out of things than they really are.<modsnip>

Did anyone for the defense testify that ZA knew Clint Bobo?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 153 more.
Total: 709 (members: 154, guests: 555)

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
555
Total visitors
709
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,219
Messages
18,236,437
Members
234,321
Latest member
treto20
Back
Top