Richard Grund, in a police interview, states that Casey had talked about a nanny named Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales, long, long before Caylee's demise. If, he was telling the truth, then it is impossible that Casey was talking about the Zenaida Gonzales who filed the complaint against Casey. Granted, Casey was lying even back then, however, her description of the fake nanny never came anywhere close to the description of Zenaida Gonzales.
Both Greene and M&M presented the jailhouse tape and LE showing Casey a photo of this Zenaida Gonzales. M&M is using both pieces of evidence as proof in his defamation case, while Greene is using both pieces to show Casey exonerated this Zenaida Gonzales. Which is legally correct? That will be for Judge Munyon to decide.
It is a fact that in the original complaint that the name Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales was used 23 times. M&M claims it was an oversight, while Greene claims the use was disingenuous, and was attempting to portray Zenaida as the person in Casey's imagination. The amended complaint corrected the "oversight," however, Zenaida also made 8 television interviews where she portrayed herself as Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales. Again, what is legally correct in this situation will be up to Judge Munyon to decide.
We should know the judge's decision in less than 60 days. Personally, I think Munyon is going to grant Greene's motion for summary judgment and deny M&M's motion for partial summary judgment. As always, my entire post is my opinion only.