tippytoes
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 490
- Reaction score
- 0
IrishSweetOne post 2756220Hmmm the name of the site is dailyBS . That is exactly what I saw / heard . Let's dissect this piece by piece 
First there was nothing either reporter found or reported that had any sort of shock value IMO. The reporter claims to have been lied to but yet fails substantiate such claims or more specificly what ZFG has lied about
Respectfully snipped, only for space because I thought your synopsis was perfect! Just to further the analysis, the first interviewee was Raechel K, known to me for making and recording phone calls to LP and CA and posting them online....In any case, aside from her habit of talking over her subjects, she said she had nothing but sympathy for ZG.
RK rambled through his interrogation never disagreeing with anything ZG says. ZG states, to both interviewers, that she isn't speaking with them for a donation, that she has turned down tabloids and she wants to clear her name. When RK mentions that the As wouldn't have the money for a large judgment even in the event she wins her case, ZG acknowledges that and restates she is trying to clear her good name.
When pressed by Raechel, she says that if people want to donate "fifty cents" to Paypal, she'd only take the money for her kids. Hardly the kind of windfall that ever paid for the outgoing minutes she used talking to these two people for their web site.
After the phone call ends, RK brings up the documentation...never actually letting ZG address the documents and yes, they are old and could well be inaccurate. At the very least, they actually PROVE that ZG is broke. He also makes it clear that in his personal opinion (which I actually agree with) her doesn't believe anyone should profit from this tragic circumstance so it kind of seems he was predisposed to NOT link her Paypal regardless.
The whole interview seemed sensationalized to me, very much akin to NG and her yawn-producing "bombshells." After listening, I only wish I could get that hour of my life back. Huge waste....
First there was nothing either reporter found or reported that had any sort of shock value IMO. The reporter claims to have been lied to but yet fails substantiate such claims or more specificly what ZFG has lied about
Respectfully snipped, only for space because I thought your synopsis was perfect! Just to further the analysis, the first interviewee was Raechel K, known to me for making and recording phone calls to LP and CA and posting them online....In any case, aside from her habit of talking over her subjects, she said she had nothing but sympathy for ZG.
RK rambled through his interrogation never disagreeing with anything ZG says. ZG states, to both interviewers, that she isn't speaking with them for a donation, that she has turned down tabloids and she wants to clear her name. When RK mentions that the As wouldn't have the money for a large judgment even in the event she wins her case, ZG acknowledges that and restates she is trying to clear her good name.
When pressed by Raechel, she says that if people want to donate "fifty cents" to Paypal, she'd only take the money for her kids. Hardly the kind of windfall that ever paid for the outgoing minutes she used talking to these two people for their web site.
After the phone call ends, RK brings up the documentation...never actually letting ZG address the documents and yes, they are old and could well be inaccurate. At the very least, they actually PROVE that ZG is broke. He also makes it clear that in his personal opinion (which I actually agree with) her doesn't believe anyone should profit from this tragic circumstance so it kind of seems he was predisposed to NOT link her Paypal regardless.
The whole interview seemed sensationalized to me, very much akin to NG and her yawn-producing "bombshells." After listening, I only wish I could get that hour of my life back. Huge waste....
