Hour-long interview with ZG, posted 9-30.
http://thedailybs.com/news/?p=942
Hmmm the name of the site is dailyBS . That is exactly what I saw / heard . Let's dissect this piece by piece
First there was nothing either reporter found or reported that had any sort of shock value IMO. The reporter claims to have been lied to but yet fails substantiate such claims or more specificly what ZFG has lied about .
Reporter makes claim that her name is not ZFG but rather ZCG , several possible explanations are possible . Here's a few
if the documents reporter provided are in fact this ZG.
1. C could be a middle name not a last name like the F would represent example Z C F G , she could still be ZFG just not use the middle name .
2. Could the C represent a married name later dropped at time of divorce
The reporter offered NO proof there is no F involved with this ZG , regardless this is still the ONLY ZG associated with Sawgrass apts .
Next the reporter suggests that because ZFG is recieving SS and or Child support . The documents supplied are dated 2004 and appear to be in conjunction with either a custody or child support order . There is nothing provided by this reporter that is proof that ZFG
IS NOW RECIEVING SS , support or gov. assist . Unless the childs natural father is dead or receiving SS then ZFG or her children would
NOT BE ELIGIBLE for SS period . SSI is an entirely different matter , even so reporter provided NO proof of either .
Child support is based off of income provided by the absent parent , in some states both parents income is calculated in determining the order for support . Could be 5 bucks a wk or $200 ordered , doesn't mean he's paying it or that she received it . Again reporter never supplied a dollar amount in reference to such claim .
Next the reporter suggests a look at
why she is broke but only povides proof that supports the fact that she is broke and can't pay her debts . Duh
What was provided have dates back 1998 ........Hello
The forth item the reporter provides only backs up the claim that she is in fact broke . Again the dates on these documents are 2007 and hold no water IMO . What does an eviction in 2007 have to do with her current situation ? If the reporter is laying down foundation that ZFG was broke before the KC story , I haven't heard anyone including ZFG say she was not . She herself has said she was struggling before and how does this in anyway imply she not a victim in this case ???
The fifth item states purportedly meaning
Assumed to be suchthe network paid for her rent, food . Offers NO proof !!
He further states ZFG propositioned him in the tune of $1500 in exchange for her interview . This would only hold merit if the reporter would have asked ZFG on record if she did in fact attempt to solicit payment from him for $1500 in exchange for the interview . Reporter NEVER mentions this in the audio portion of the interview .
Next the reporter claims that because he posted a picture of ZFG standing next to a hummer that she is the owner of said vehicle . Many people on Myspace have pictures of them selves standing next to cars/trucks doesn't mean they own them . So again NO proof that ZFG is driving around a hummer .
The reporter goes on to say ZFG is a con artist that has lied to the American public in an attempt to make them feel sorry for her while she collects CS & gov assist. WTF ????? LOL
He continues on to say this is the reason he refuses to post paypal info .
I never heard anywhere in the interview did ZFG ask , beg or push anyone to help her out by contributing to her paypal account that someone else asked her to set up because that person wanted to help . I have yet to see ZFG pushing a paypal account .If she has I haven't seen it .
This post is MOO
