Going to summarize a little of what John Morgan said on CNN. I suspect it'll be up on their link later.
Per JM:
Z - lost her job.
The apartment complex where she lived asked her to move.
When she was interviewed, she talked with her face blacked out; she doesn't want to be seen; she doesn't want to be known; she doesn't deserve this.
Let the police come to your door and question you about a child's disappearance. "If you don't fight back for your good name, God help you."
The police came to Z, knew her childrens' names, the make, model and color of her car.
$15,000 damages is jurisdictional amount to get into court.
This gives the plaintiff deposition and subpoena power, of KC, her mother, her father, and her friends. And they (the plaintiff) are going to be taking a pro-active position.
Nobody is denying any of this. The police investigate people before they interview them etc etc. Anyway, my understanding from all that I have read is:
1. She lost her job before this happened.
2. Lee investigated her himself and gave some of this information to them regarding the car in particular.
3. I don't blame her for fighting back but I feel the person in the suit that she is blaming for these troubles is not to blame, the media and bloggers who blew this out of proportion are. Casey never pointed the finger at THIS person. She is an innocent victim of the press and internet junkies that persecuted her.
4. I HAVE ALWAYS supported ZG from the beggining please view ALL OF MY THREADS! I created a timeline thread and spent neumerous hours transcribbing the police documents for any and all ZANNY THE NANNY references in order to seek out the "actual" Zanny Casey used as a babby sitter and or find evidence on how/where Casey derived this fake name. I even susspect she indeed accuired it somehow from stealing this persons information from either Sawgrass itself or Myspace or both.
5. I hope she wins.
6. Please stop thinking that those of us who have a strong feeling that she wil lose are against her in any fashion many of us are not, we are just objectivley considering the claims and cannot see a win. Too much needs to be proven in the case against Casey and unless they overturn alot of evidence I cannot see how they can accomplish it.
7. HO insurance? She may live there but it is to protect others from harm. They must prove intent of harm I just don't see it.
8. Unless you can show stronger evidecne other than repeating the same information over and over all of which many of us knew well before this thread started.... you will not convince anyone otherwise. Just as I am sure I will not convince you otherwise.
9. Please view this a little more objectively try and look at it from the other angle, this is even what lawyers do so they can defend against opposing council arguments. I see your angle 100% But there are strong arguments against them.
10. Challenge: PROVE Casey intended to speccificaly cause this person harm, don;t just come back and say she used her name, thats not intent of causing her harm. What did she have against this person? How did she know her in the first place to decide to cause her harm? These are just two questions to start anyone ff in seeking to prove this. I don;t think it is possible but please by all means try. If I thought it was myself I would honestly try, but I don't.
AGAIN: I hope she wins I really do. I am all in favor of laying as many charges on Casey as possible atm because I HOPE she goes to jail on theft charges and they can postpone the child neglect until they get even stronger evidence for a possible murder charge. I really think Caylee is gone.
ABOVE ALL: I WISH to be proven wrong and that someone comes forward with Caylee alive and breathing!