morf13
Ver. Insider Golden State Killer & Zodiac Killer
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Messages
- 955
- Reaction score
- 2,603
Yeah i saw that. Be careful when Dennis Kauffman is involved. Have to tread lightly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You may be wrong about Guy Ward Hendrickson. I believe he is Zodiac and he also was a friend of Gareth Penn. Penn declared himself Zodiac in his book "Times 17" he took over as Zodiac after Guy Ward Hendrickson died. It is believed that Penn killed a young couple at Jenner Beach, Calif in 2004 and also killed two women near Seattle, WA in 2006.
"Over the years,there has been a surprising number of unsolved murders at beaches in Calif."
How so? Beaches are - at night, when I'm guessing most of these murders occurred:
- generally secluded. Not many people there to see a murderer, or hear a murder in progress.
- dark.
- moreover, I bet the people getting killed are intentionally looking for someplace secluded and away from others - lovers, or people who just need some time alone, night or day.
Beaches are a good spot for a serial killer to prey on others.
It's also a good spot to catch and kill your SO and their partner if you catch them cheating on you. "Must've been that thar Zodiac killer!"
- generally
That's the thing,there is no motive,no robbery,no rape,nothing. The common thing is that these people are killed for no reason.That's what makes it seem like they could all be Zodiac victims(or that of a second serial killer)
Or a series of serial killers, it doesn't have to be one.
Serial killers generall either kill people who won't be missed or can otherwise be explained away (prostitutes, runaways, transients) or kill in an area where they won't get caught. If a killer tends towards the latter - lurking on a beach at night, especially in California, is something more than one killer is going to think of.
Zodiac Claim to be Questioned By SF Police
A woman who in late April stood in front of dozens of people and claimed her father was the infamous Zodiac killer will be questioned by the San Francisco Police Department on Wednesday.
and
Perez said she saw a composite sketch of the Zodiac killer in August 2007 and recognized the man as her father, Guy Ward Hendrickson, who died in 1983.
San Francisco police Lt. Michael Staskos has reportedly received information from forensic experts who say handwriting, psychological and DNA evidence link Perez to her involvement in the Zodiac case and will question her Wednesday.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Zodiac-Claim-to-be-Questioned-By-SF-Police.html
We will see,I will be shocked if she telling the truth
SAN FRANCISCO A woman who in late April stood in front of dozens of people and claimed her father was the infamous Zodiac killer will be questioned by the San Francisco Police Department on Wednesday after DNA evidence linked her to the famous case.
morf, do you read this the same way I do?
http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_12589866
It sounds as though they are implying that there truly is DNA evidence linking Perez (and her father) to Z's DNA (presumably from the stamps).
This would be the first I've heard of this..unless I'm totally misinterpreting the article.
ZODIAC Letter to the FBI...Take a look,do you think this is authentic?
The first letter is a verified letter from Zodiac. The second letter is a letter to the FBI that i found in their declassified files,along with a copy of the return envelope.The return address is blacked out,but the city it is post marked from is there,but hard to read.
I personally believe that the lower case letter "d" is a spot on match in both letters.The way it leans to the right,and has a bit of a loop at the top. In addition,in the letter to the FBI,he crosses out a word that looks like the word PUTTING,and writes over top of it the word ESTABLISHING. Zodiac on more than one occasion crossed out a word,and wrote another word over top of it.I also went on to read the following from the FBI regarding this letter:
"These are letters received in the Zodiac case.It has not been definately established that all of these letters were written by the Zodiac"
Also if you look on the envelope that the letter was sent in to the FBI,the lower case letter "f" looks alot like Zodiac's as well. The envelope was addressed and mailed to the FBI office in Boston. And the return address as i said is blacked out but the postmark is visible,but hard to read.If anyone here is computer savy and could enlarge it and clean it up,it would be much appreciated.I wish i could determine who the letter is from.From the subject matter in the letter,it almost sounds like an investiagtor communicating with the FBI office, or a citizen trying to give the FBI some info,but there is no way to determine where/who sent it with the return address blacked out.I wish i could make out the postmark.Since it is 11 years after the last confirmed Zodiac attack,the postmark could be important if it is from another city or state,showing that perhaps Zodiac moved.
I think i know why the letter may have been sent to the office in Boston,and that makes me think of one person that may have written it to the Boston FBI,but i will not comment on it here at this time.
Please give your opinions on the samples when compared to each other. Do we have any hand writing experts here?
The chances of her being the Zodiac's daughter are a million to one--the chances of her being both JFK's daughter and the Zodiac's daughter are a gazillion to none
She alleges that Guy Ward Hendrickson, Perez's adopted father, killed one victim while she was waiting in a car, and that she herself sent some of the killer's infamous cryptic letters.
Would we though? If I'm mistaken, please forgive me but has it been the assumption it's been male this whole time? Has it ever been said that it was male DNA on the envelopes? IIRC, all I've heard is that there is some DNA on the envelopes that didn't match any known suspects (or it could have been a known suspect with someone else licking it). Perhaps it's just always been an assumption, or kept out of the public in case someone came and broke the case with knowing something that only the killer or someone closely aquainted would know.I doubt very much that Perez licked the stamps - if the DNA was female, I guess we'd know about it.