- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 4,019
- Reaction score
- 17,216
by your on admission you do not need witnesses to determine probable cause.LE COULD have arrested GZ on the spot but they chose not to,I guess that's what you meant by probable cause is determined by free will.They could have but they did not.Why ?
Could it be racism?
You need witnesses to determine probable cause when the facts aren't evident without them... You don't just assume that someone has committed a crime without reason; that's not how the judicial system was constructed.