My favorite part of the show was when he matter-of-factory said"I missed you Nancy" and she half rolled her eyes. Priceless.
Everyone by now knows NG's schtick. I'm surprised more of her 'guests' doesn't call her out on it.
My favorite part of the show was when he matter-of-factory said"I missed you Nancy" and she half rolled her eyes. Priceless.
BBM
Yes they did. They were the ones that said in the presser that GZ had contacted the SA on his own as well as the part about just being legal advisors.
JMHO
Yuck, it was so gross to watch the older attorney mocking the congresswoman and his voice was screeching. Didn't Howard Deen lose his bid for president a few years ago for doing that same type of screechy noise with his voice? It's so ugly. I think piers used a word last night to describe these attorneys but I can't remember it. It was just ugly and tacky.
IMO They were speaking out in defense of GZ and it seems anyone who does that people take issue with.This is a victims forum and until I see evidence from a real source(AD)GZ is as much a victim as TM is.The media and others have been playing on the emotional aspects of this case IMO Emotion have nothing to do with the law.
IMO They were speaking out in defense of GZ and it seems anyone who does that people take issue with.This is a victims forum and until I see evidence from a real source(AD)GZ is as much a victim as TM is.The media and others have been playing on the emotional aspects of this case IMO Emotion have nothing to do with the law.
I've wondered about that myself. No lawyer is going to go down for a bad client. I think that press conference yesterday was their way of flipping him off, just not actually doing that. They CYA'd by saying he could contact them, but like he would really contact them now? They seem like sore losers to me, and apparently are childish enough to make fools of themselves just to send GZ a message, if that is what they were doing. Maybe they wanted to show him what he passed up and how it's his loss now. Who knows.
They did not say that the prosecutors office told them that they are no longer his lawyers.
He told the SA that they were only his legal advisors.
~jmo~
They did not say that the prosecutors office told them that they are no longer his lawyers.
I think that ejector slide might have come back and whacked him in the side of the nose.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/Co...tion/-/1637132/10452410/-/gx69ei/-/index.html
In a memo from her office, Corey said she will release new information regarding the investigation into Martin's death, but no specifics were provided.
BBM
what could it be?
They did not say that the prosecutors office told them that they are no longer his lawyers.
Do a look up on the gun GZ used. I didn't make it up and I don't like movies with guns. Thanks.
He told the SA that they were only his legal advisors.
~jmo~
IMO They did not portray him as a whack job,just as someone who has had their world turned upside down due to having to defend himself. I would imagine only someone like a gang member who has killed for sport would not be affected by having to shoot a 17yr old.JMO
I listened to the first part of the conference and, imo, it goes without saying that that is exactly what happened. The prosecutor's office would have called Sonner and Uhrig immediately and would have said something like, "hey, your guy just called us and when we said we couldn't talk to him w/o you, he said you're not representing him any more. Is that true?" At which point Sonner and Uhrig would have become very confused, tried to get in touch with GZ, failed, and formally announced that they are no longer representing him based on his statements to the prosecutor and their inability to confirm or refute the prosecutor's recounting of events with GZ.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you are trying to say, though.
They did not say that the prosecutors office told them that they are no longer his lawyers.
I've seen no evidence that GZ had to shoot TM. His word alone doesn't cut it for me.