debs
Former Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,700
- Reaction score
- 52
Let me explain it this way....If my grand daughter were missing for 31 days...and I just found my daughter that I had not seen in a month...I would go directly to where she was or had been staying (the place I just picked her up from) and I would tear it apart looking for my grand daughter. I would have NO REASON to go look in MY OWN BACK YARD....unless my last name was Anthony! This whole action makes no sense to me....
She had to go through Amy to find out where Casey was. She got to TonE's apartment and was told Caylee was not there but with the nanny. After driving Amy home and being stonewalled by Casey, Cindy drove to the police department, only to find it closed (first 911 call). She took Casey back to the house and a couple more hours of stonewalling until Casey spills the beans that "the babysitter took her" (second 911 call), and the first of several mixups on the date she last saw Caylee (she says the 7th of June--interestingly enough, that same weekend that Casey was supposed to finally get her parents out of HER house). The 3rd call was Cindy letting everyone know how urgent the matter was an demanding people get there now because "it smells like there's been a dead body in the damn car!"
But when they're talking about having searched their own backyard, what they were doing was covering the truth. They were attempting to change the public perspective of cadaver dog hits in the backyard by adding the qualifier. Cadaver dogs had searched their yard, so they had to prove the dogs were wrong because THEY searched their yard too. Cindy's need to interject these qualifiers is constantly fascinating to me. It wasn't enough to say "The dogs didn't seem like they were consistent. I'm not sure what they think the dogs smelled." She had to add the qualifier that they'd searched around the playhouse and they didn't find anything. Always with the qualifiers, our Cindy.
It is done to hide the truth. To throw people off. To block the public from seeing inside the dysfunction. Is it done as a denial mechanism? Heck no. There's no denial at work here in this. Is it done as a defense mechanism? I can concede that it's done defensively. However, hiding the truth, changing facts that are easily verified, and ultimately manipulating events in such a way that it adds more than just a little frustration at their behavior firstly, but then the complexity of the case. And most assuredly, people who lie so rapidly in such a defensive manner have lived their lives doing it, have honed it to an ingrained behavior. The truth will out, but the truth will never be easily gleaned, and the truth will rarely if ever come from the Anthony's willingly.