2010.05.21 Document Release

Status
Not open for further replies.
More about the skirt on page 14254.

"Art #8 Sealed paper bag containing skirt brand name 'American Eagle' size 4. Q-32
(Item # H 52175) See photo for more details.
Note: In this piece of evidence you will see more suspected stain on the other side of the skirt."

On page 14253 it says:

"Please examine the all Q-25 to Q-35 please perform examination on the suspected stains and determine if the stains contain any body fluid / DNA. If any DNA profile is developed please compare against DNA of Caylee Marie Anthony."
 
OCSO did lift latent prints??? Page 582

Please tell me they aren't going to end up being mystery prints or someone in one of the labs. That piece of information is kind slid into this dump..hm I need further information please LMAO.
 
I like that on page 576 they took swabs of 2 hot irons and 2 of the pump for the inflatable bed
they will have evidence they crossed every t and dotted every i to prove there wasn't a nanny
 
What about the image of the label though with what looks like a barcode and possible partial date stamp? Is there any mention anywhere what this image is? Page 7

http://www.wesh.com/download/2010/0521/23631419.pdf

From what I'm seeing...on page 6...it says the following slides are from a presentation EF did...it says the slides are "mock" evidence....so, IMO, just "examples", not so much actual evidence...even though the ones about the outside "nonadheisive side" duct tape fingerprint is pretty thought provoking.(???)
Seems the slide with the barcode is showing what a print looks like under "white light" - it appears to be a packageing from something "chicken flavor" ("ken flavor" - as in picture)....also see word "noodles" in circle on lower right side...my guess..."Chicken flavor Oodles of Noodles"...."Cup of Noodles", etc package....top looks like "tear off" type of ridges....

So:

Slide 1 = her name, expertise
Slide 2 = fingerprint just to further explain what her expertise is
Slide 3 = examination types
SLIDE 4 = "MOCK" slide - print under white light*
SLIDE 5 = "MOCK" slide - print using RUVIS*
SLIDE 6 = From internet...she draws heart
SLIDE 7 = Case info
SLIDE 8 = From internet
Slide 9, 10...etc

* Find it odd that they didn't use the SAME item to show the different methods....slide 4 is chicken noodle something or other....slide 5 is duct tape....with OTHER slides following them being duct tape pics from the actual evidence pics from doc dumps in this case....makes ME go hmmmm. OR, the SA just tryin' to psych out JB and co. further....LOL Make them loose whatever faculties they have left....
 
On page 103 is a note that says that SA NS reiterated that he would like all communication to go through the FBI Orlando office -- not OCSO: media is ____________ by SO.

I cannot make out what is written....has anyone else figured that out???
TIA

Also I find it VERY interesting that on page 314 it says that "SA NS is currently in Baghdad"......I read that correctly right?? Could this possibly be to interview a certain old love of KC's ???

I hope so.....I've always thought that person needed to be questioned about KC....I don't think he did anything wrong, just think he might know a few things that could connect a few dots in this case. MOO

I got into the 400's .....but I am kind of disappointed. :0( Not much there.

JMHO's

Perhaps Ns went to baghdad to interview one of Kc's friends.
 
Looks like we've seen all this before, except for EF's drawing of the heart shape on a photo of Q64 used in a Power Point presentation, despite the fact that previous FBI notes said the heart shape was on Q63.
 
On page 103 is a note that says that SA NS reiterated that he would like all communication to go through the FBI Orlando office -- not OCSO: media is ____________ by SO.

I cannot make out what is written....has anyone else figured that out???
TIA

Also I find it VERY interesting that on page 314 it says that "SA NS is currently in Baghdad"......I read that correctly right?? Could this possibly be to interview a certain old love of KC's ???

I hope so.....I've always thought that person needed to be questioned about KC....I don't think he did anything wrong, just think he might know a few things that could connect a few dots in this case. MOO

I got into the 400's .....but I am kind of disappointed. :0( Not much there.

JMHO's

camped
 
Looks like we've seen all this before, except for EF's drawing of the heart shape on a photo of Q64 used in a Power Point presentation, despite the fact that previous FBI notes said the heart shape was on Q63.

Ouch, that hurts when they do that. lol Okay q63 or q 64. How do you draw an outline of something that you say you can't presently see. Okay on to the proper thread.

I think I have seen all these documents before. Whats new to me is that the fbi agent is saying that the body farm and entomologist is saying that it was adipocere. From what I know up to now, I only know of Dr Vasss body farm calling it an adipocere like substance, short of calling it adipocere or human adipocere.
 
On page 103 is a note that says that SA NS reiterated that he would like all communication to go through the FBI Orlando office -- not OCSO: media is ____________ by SO.

I cannot make out what is written....has anyone else figured that out???
TIA

Also I find it VERY interesting that on page 314 it says that "SA NS is currently in Baghdad"......I read that correctly right?? Could this possibly be to interview a certain old love of KC's ???
I hope so.....I've always thought that person needed to be questioned about KC....I don't think he did anything wrong, just think he might know a few things that could connect a few dots in this case. MOO

I got into the 400's .....but I am kind of disappointed. :0( Not much there.

JMHO's

Yes, I remember reading that before. I thought maybe he was deployed but you have a good guess there.
 
MD MOMMY said:
Please tell me they aren't going to end up being mystery prints or someone in one of the labs. That piece of information is kind slid into this dump..hm I need further information please LMAO.

I have been wondering about this. Maybe they don't have any damning fingerprints, but another kind of print instead? The defense keeps asking specifically about fingerprints. Maybe they have a palm print? Or a footprint (not likely, I know, just using this to illustrate that there are other prints besides fingerprints). Or teethmarks? There are many different kinds of prints and marks that can be found besides fingerprints.
 
pg 18 "as far as I see it,...."
right you don't see things the same way the world does apparently
 
On page 103 is a note that says that SA NS reiterated that he would like all communication to go through the FBI Orlando office -- not OCSO: media is ____________ by SO.

I cannot make out what is written....has anyone else figured that out???
TIA

Also I find it VERY interesting that on page 314 it says that "SA NS is currently in Baghdad"......I read that correctly right?? Could this possibly be to interview a certain old love of KC's ???

I hope so.....I've always thought that person needed to be questioned about KC....I don't think he did anything wrong, just think he might know a few things that could connect a few dots in this case. MOO

I got into the 400's .....but I am kind of disappointed. :0( Not much there.

JMHO's
Is there a State's Attorney with initials NS?
 
http://www.wesh.com/download/2010/0521/23631419.pdf

From what I'm seeing...on page 6...it says the following slides are from a presentation EF did...it says the slides are "mock" evidence....so, IMO, just "examples", not so much actual evidence...even though the ones about the outside "nonadheisive side" duct tape fingerprint is pretty thought provoking.(???)
Seems the slide with the barcode is showing what a print looks like under "white light" - it appears to be a packageing from something "chicken flavor" ("ken flavor" - as in picture)....also see word "noodles" in circle on lower right side...my guess..."Chicken flavor Oodles of Noodles"...."Cup of Noodles", etc package....top looks like "tear off" type of ridges....

So:

Slide 1 = her name, expertise
Slide 2 = fingerprint just to further explain what her expertise is
Slide 3 = examination types
SLIDE 4 = "MOCK" slide - print under white light*
SLIDE 5 = "MOCK" slide - print using RUVIS*
SLIDE 6 = From internet...she draws heart
SLIDE 7 = Case info
SLIDE 8 = From internet
Slide 9, 10...etc

* Find it odd that they didn't use the SAME item to show the different methods....slide 4 is chicken noodle something or other....slide 5 is duct tape....with OTHER slides following them being duct tape pics from the actual evidence pics from doc dumps in this case....makes ME go hmmmm. OR, the SA just tryin' to psych out JB and co. further....LOL Make them loose whatever faculties they have left....


Remember the mysterious fingerprint in one of the previous dumps? It was just there without comment or explanation. I hope it wasn't just a picture of the powerpoint. Does anyone know where that was?
 
not important but they mispelled containing on pg 42 AND yes I care a lot about finding out the paternity lol
 
Reminder: This thread is for surfacing info from the discovery NOT for sleuthing out or researching the details. Search and bump existing threads to update them with any new information. If new info is surfaced that doen't already have a thread, create a new thread and discuss the details there.

If you bump an old thread or create a new one please post on this thread to let others know where they can go to have the detailed discussion.

Where this post lands is random.

Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
183
Guests online
506
Total visitors
689

Forum statistics

Threads
625,742
Messages
18,509,163
Members
240,836
Latest member
juleebeth
Back
Top