2010.06.01 Hearing

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #261
"Casey Anthony suffered a fall in the courthouse while being transported to the courtroom and received what appear to be minor injuries when her restraints became entangled and she fell forward. Escorting officers were unable to catch her before she fell. She is currently being seen by medical personnel in an undisclosed location," Orange County Corrections spokesperson Allen Moore said in a release. "Based on all information available, this was purely an accident."
http://www.wftv.com/news/23752570/detail.html
 
  • #262
Motion denied
 
  • #263
Denied! :woohoo:
 
  • #264
UM...this came across twitter just now... @WESH BREAKING: #CaseyAnthony falls at courthouse, suffers minor injuries. That's why she's not at hearing

Gee, I hope she didn't trip on her "chains"!

Did I say that? :blushing:
 
  • #265
At work, sneaking in here. Thanks to everyone for posting.

Anyone got a brief synopsis, what has been ruled on so far and how?

TIA!!!

so far.

motion to seal jail logs, put on hold pending perry doing research. he believes he will deny it. ruling due next week.

motion regarding stricklands rulings. DENIED
 
  • #266
Motion denied
 
  • #267
Judge saying the secrecy of the Grand Jury is sacrosanct, motion denied, he was giving some further direction but I got called away, I'll have to go back and view the rest of that
 
  • #268
I have the feeling that George cannot attend any court hearings that pertain to the death penalty and his daughter. Too stressful on him. Wonder seriously how he will be able to sit thru the trial.
 
  • #269
Wow, KC fell on her way to court.....minor injuries, shackles tangled she fell forward
 
  • #270
in the other case a victim had a recording device going, he was murdered with the recording device running and it was caught on tape, the defendant moved to suppress the tape recording according to this same statute. The court in that case found that that type of recording would not be excluded

but Judge says those circumstances were special and different
 
  • #271
Motion to admit recording denied.
 
  • #272
Here comes JB...nope, it's CM

Motion to strike notice of aggravating circumstances
 
  • #273
Oh goodie, now it's JB's turn to say something stupid
 
  • #274
in the other case a victim had a recording device going, he was murdered with the recording device running and it was caught on tape, the defendant moved to suppress the tape recording according to this same statute. The court in that case found that that type of recording would not be excluded

Thank you JESUS there's not a recording of Caylee dying...that would just be AWFUL...
 
  • #275
I have the feeling that George cannot attend any court hearings that pertain to the death penalty and his daughter. Too stressful on him. Wonder seriously how he will be able to sit thru the trial.

I don't know if he cannot attend, but I can sure understand why he wouldn't want to attend considering the subject of today's hearing on the grand jury transcript! Ackward........
 
  • #276
i would not be shocked if, it comes down to it, that casey claims that george and cindy moved the body and/or murdered her

Neither would I. And the fact that George isn't there for the second time in a row tends to raise some red flags.


Make that 3 of us. Because, God knows, they've openly admitted and proven they would do anything to protect KC. If that turns out to be the strategy, I'll go one step further and suggest that it was CA who volunteered GA to be the 'fall guy'. And we all know GA can't say No to his wife.


Oh my, what a tangled web we weave....
 
  • #277
DP aggr circumstances up. CM arguing it.

Hi is emphasising the "may" and says that SA could have easily said "may not" too.

claims language does not comport
 
  • #278
Did he rule about Joe Jackson? Did he hear all of JS previous motions? Sorry..atwork
 
  • #279
SA - the best state can say one year before trial is "may" because situations "may change" Do you prefer "shall."
 
  • #280
DP aggr circumstances up. CM arguing it.

Hi is emphasising the "may" and says that SA could have easily said "may not" too.

claims language does not comport

You have got to be kidding me...they're whining for a "may not?" WTH!?!?!?!

SA - the best state can say one year before trial is "may" because situations "may change" Do you prefer "shall."

Ahahahahahahahaha! I love the state's response! WOOT! GO STATE!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
163
Guests online
1,325
Total visitors
1,488

Forum statistics

Threads
632,403
Messages
18,625,983
Members
243,138
Latest member
BlueMaven
Back
Top