GrainneDhu
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reaction score
- 58
There's a pesky little obstacle to the idea of moving in with her parents. The restraining order prevents her from doing so, because her teenage son is currently living with them, and she's not allowed to have contact with him. While I wouldn't put it past her to ask them to kick him out so she could move in, I don't imagine they'd go for that. And if she's still got a lawyer representing her, presumably he'd point out to her that this wouldn't exactly add credibility to her claim to be a loving mother.
BBM
Can you give me a current link that shows the RO applies to her older child, J, as well as to baby K? When I read the RO this morning, it didn't mention J at all and the order clearly applies only to KH and baby K.
KH isn't J's legal guardian, so he has no status to file on his behalf. Whoever is J's legal guardian would have to do that.
The question of J's legal guardian is tricky, besides. If I understand matters correctly, J was legally adopted by TMH's second husband. TMH's second husband subsequently paid child support for J after TMH filed a motion in court alleging that adoptive father had not had contact with J in over three years.
Then J moved out to live with TMH's parents. And now he is living, I believe, with his biological father, who may or may not have given up his parental rights when J was adopted by TMH's 2nd husband.
Just trying to understand the permutations of custody, etc, is overwhelmingly difficult!
Unless the recent news reports are wrong (a distinct possibility based on previous mistakes), J is not living with TMH's parents anyway. So even if the RO order were to apply to him (and I don't think it does), she would still be free to move in with her parents.