That's a tough one. If their money is community property (and I do recognize the worth of parents who contribute to the family and finances by caring for the children at home) and she's being asked to leave the house, in a normal situation she'd be entitled to support... but my gosh this is a long way from a normal situation. I wonder what they'll do. I'm glad it's not my choice to decide.
To the best of my knowledge, Terri has not been gainfully employed since she became Kaine's "live-in". She reportedly gave up a teaching position to move in with Mr. Horman and care for baby Kyron. The rest is history![]()
hmmmmmmmm let me think. When I got divorced, I got the house, alimony, and child support. He got nothing, not even visitation.
The kicker is that he rarely held a job, during our marriage. I supported the family. It sure felt just that he had to pay me for a change.
I live in Oregon.
Just on JVM show.
Terri Horman wants money from Kaine before she will leave the house!
She has no children and cannot get child support.
Her lawyer asked for this money motion today at court!:banghead:
I think it would make a difference if we knew how much she is wanting. Setting up housekeeping isn't cheap.
I think KH should have a dna test done on the baby. Ouch, I didn't want to say that but I have been thinking it.
I know. On one hand, a parent who minds the home and kids has a right to a share. But on the other, if she did indeed murder one of the children, let alone possibly tried to hire someone to kill her husband... It's sort of like, she would be getting paid for services she not even completely failed at but, rather, become completely corrupt in.
I, too, do not envy the judge who has to deal with all of this.
I am not a lawyer, but I think the idea behind the expectations of both partners getting some share of the family savings at the time of a divorce is that that a spouse without paid employment who has stayed at home to watch minor children has, in effect, made it possible for the other partner to work and accumulate the wealth s/he has. Thus, in normal proceedings, s/he would have some reasonable access to the family wealth accrued during his or her unpaid service in the home.
Now, that is in theory. So don't take it as an endorsement in this case, as I don't know the particulars, at all.
MOO.
This is a wise move in any divorce in which infidelity is even remotely suspected.
I, too, do not envy the judge who has to deal with all of this.
It was my understanding that she lost her job because of the child endangerment conviction. I'll try to find a link.
Btw, I looked up the Oregon child support rules. Not having an income does not excuse you from paying child support to the custodial parent.
Get a job, Terri. You can't stay home with the kids anymore, so there shouldn't be any impediments.
But how does this play into the legality of TH trying to have KH killed, and abducting Baby K? I would think there would be a Dissolution (law), in law, means to end a legal entity or agreement such as a marriage, adoption, or corporation, in which case does she still get monies?
Well, based off my readings for law school - as he's been Baby K's parent since she was born and claimed her as his own child, the law may still recognize him as her legal father, regardless of DNA. There have been cases where the non-biological father has had to pay child support because they have acted as the child's parent for so long. Depending on Oregon law, DNA showing she is not his daughter might not affect anything as far as custody/support.
Neither do I - especially if he has to rule for the law, which may run counter to what the court of public opinion holds.