I don't think she will. What I meant by HOW she was asking was the tone of this motion. She's not getting up there and begging the court to see her own child and why that would be in baby K's best interests. She's letting some expert who doesn't even know her, and who can only quote on general cases and studies that seeing a child is best for the mother. That's it. No begging, no nothing by Terri herself to see her own child. She doesn't even want to pay for seeing her own child! I haven't seen her lift one finger to do anything to benefit this child. That just isn't right to expect everyone else to get do the work for her. She can't just sit there silently and expect to get what she wants. She has SUCH an attitude of entitlement. It's just crazy that she says she love this child, but doesn't say or actually do anything herself to see her. Let the lawyers, experts, and Kaine handle it. That has been her attitude thus far.
I understand she has the legal right to ask, but that doesn't mean that the judge has to give her the answer she wants. If she's not willing to beg, plead, and do whatever she has to do to see her own child to keep CYAing herself, that is just morally wrong to me. And to expect Kaine to pay for supervised visitation is just reprehensible. So she has a deep pocket for a good defense, but no money whatsover for this supposed, beloved child? Wow, if that isn't blatantly saying where her priorities are, I don't know what else could be more obvious. I'm sure friends and family would help her see her own child. But she'd rather make sure she has a dream defense lawyer instead.
But I understand that this is probably SOP for her lawyer. I understand that she legally has the right to ask. It doesn't mean I agree with how she asked and what she is asking for. I'm just waiting for the judge to answer her with a big, fat NO.
It's painfully obvious that Terri still only cares about Terri. I think I'm more on the moral side while others are more on the legal side. But we can agree to disagree.
