2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE Afternoon Session

[logicalgirl]

Proberly not allowed in the courtroom.

No, the public is allowed in - guess in this district they just aren't interested. Yesterday a spectator wandered into the jury holding tank by mistake - had to come up and explain to the judge.:great:

 

[Tulessa]

Proberly not allowed in the courtroom.

I thought they were?

 

[Amster]

This lady is confusing me.....:waitasec:

 

[Patty G]

I don't get it.

Apparently these are the cans that have a piece of carpet from the truck of Casey's car, of which, smelled like a dead body was in the car. The sealed cans when opened would smell like a dead body was in the can.

Dr. Vass jumped back 2 feet when he opened the can and the smell that came out of the can.

 

[costalpilot]

baez has got to be conflicted by this lady.

shes a minority, which he loves

shes intelligent, which he hates

 

[darcedarce]

PT doesn't want to judge but claims she has no problem judging ICA...Wha?


Claims she has no friends... Interesting.

 

[Blue Jackets fan]

I thought they were?

I didn't know the public would be allowed during any jury selection.

 

[ohiogirl]

No friends, that's sad.

 

[missyjane77]

Awww, she doesn't have any friends that she socializes with. That's kind of sad.

 

[PMLsmom]

No friends?

 

[Leila]

Was this based on religious beliefs? If so, did she lie before or today? :waitasec:

IIRC..............initially she said her religious beliefs wouldn't allow her to sit in judgement of another person.

 

[logicalgirl]

not as many as jb would like .......

I'm still laughing about the guy who had never heard the name Jose Baez before and didn't know who he was - was he in the courtroom? LOL - Priceless. Baez was so miffed he had to get up and ask if the juror knew any of the other names of people at the SA and DT tables. :floorlaugh:

 

[zoey]

I didn't know the public would be allowed during any jury selection.

Its public.....TV's in there

 

[GourmetSoy]

Was this based on religious beliefs? If so, did she lie before or today? :waitasec:

1319 is the lady up next, we haven't heard from her in round 2 yet

ETA: sorry, didn't realize they started already

 

[SailorMoon]

Awww, she doesn't have any friends that she socializes with. That's kind of sad.

Sounds like me. No one likes me!! That's why I lubs ya'll!!

 

[MelissaLee]

Juror doesn't have any friends (awwww) so hasn't discussed this case. Keeps to herself. Doesn't follow the news.

JMO - I truly do not think this woman could impose the DP or even LWOP if the evidence points that way. I believe her religious beliefs are very strong and ingrained, and she would not be able to do that, law be damned sort of thing.

 

[epiphany]

Prosp Juror says She's got no friends, well, not that she socializes with. Keeps to herself.

 

[Blue Jackets fan]

No friends, that's sad.

I can somwhat relate to her. I have Asperger syndrome.

 

[Mendara]

ut oh this is weird. She has no friends? I am worried.

 

[Chiquita71]

HHJP: alright thank you folks (I can hear the judge but he is not near his mic or it is not on, I cannot hear him well. )


1319: you expressed concerns about not liking to sit in the judgement of others, is that right?

yes.

HHJP: personal philosophy or religious beliefs, please explain.

I don't like to point my finger at anyone. not judging any one because of what people say.

HHJP: would that in anyway affect your ability to rending a vote based on the evidence?

no.

HHJP: can you sit and listen to all the evidence and the law I give you and render a decsion of the defendants guilt or innocence?

I have no problem with that.

HHJP: if the state did not meet it's burden would you have any problem finding the defendant not guilty?

I have no problem with it

HHJP: on the same hand if the state met its burden would you have a problem finding her guilty?

No problem.

HHJP: have you heard about this case from the media, friends?

No

HHJP: any news when it first happen.

when it first happened. a little baby got killed.

HHJP: did you hear about who may be responsible and who may not be responsible?

no

HHJP: you watch NG, any of the news mag shows?

No

HHJP: read about it in the ST. Pete or any news papers you read?

No

HHJP: speak about it with friends?

I don't have friends...

HHJP: you haven't been around any people discussing this case?

no sir.

HHJP: have you formed any opinions or impressions about ICA guilt?

(emphatic) No sir!

HHJP: you can only decide this case based on the evidence presented in the court room.

yes sir.

HHJP: any problem. we are not like erasers, some can get rid of it but some can't. some can not use those things in making a decision in this case?

Yes, sir

HHJP: any hesitation or reservation?

No sir.

HHJP: 100%

100%