Looks like DS was told to tell RB to get the laptop away from KC.
ETA: I am pretty sure I saw KC say "My mom" again while she was holding her hand up like a phone.
Yup. And right after that RB was on her cell phone.
Looks like DS was told to tell RB to get the laptop away from KC.
ETA: I am pretty sure I saw KC say "My mom" again while she was holding her hand up like a phone.
Casey just put a check by something in her notepad.
My DH just came in and asked if AF was up yet...Hmm, I think he's looking for a quickie
Wonder if Sims just discovered our thread on Rosalie in this forum and went into panic mode? :great:
Oh gosh, me too. Not good. I think JA rteally blew it. he should have challenged for cause and then used his peremptory later, when there was a more diverse pool that made it through, if possible.
I listened to this lady. She alone has me worried about the whole case. I am trained to gauge a lot from what people say, their demeanor and answers. I don't like this one bit.
And yes, no P.h.D. is needed but she could barely understand basic questions.
They are done!
They have unlimited challenges for cause but only 10 without cause. Apparently, JA used a peremptory without trying to challenge for cause first. JB objected to it saying it was an improper peremptory because it was based on race. He won. I have never seen such an objection sustained. This means, from what I understand, that this lady is definitely on the jury.
It is. Same one.
They apparently tried to use a strike and were denied based on race. Really bad.
Now it looks like the sidebar was about this juror because of his Facebook Page.
So JB just got this guy to admit to going on Social Media since Monday...WOW that was slick.
Beaz tried to use the race-card.
It worked about as well as Jack Del Rio's attempt of using the west coast offense.
my understanding is that any pj, no matter how many, can be dismissed "for cause" in that they dont meet the rules, such as impartiality, presumption of innocence, refuse to consider death penalty.....the judge then will dismiss them for cause. NEither side uses a "strike"
Both sides have 10 of these "strikes"....what i didnt know until just now, is that they have to defend their reasoning for using them, and the judge can deny, if he sees fit. Such as being racially motivated....
Can you give us that are cleaning house some details? Please? I missed it. TIA!
:great: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:My DH just came in and asked if AF was up yet...Hmm, I think he's looking for a quickie
So what?
OK his use of the term heinous tells me he did some research!! Thoughts??