2011.05.13 - Jury Selection DAY FIVE MORNING SESSION

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
I don't think going to school, getting good or decent grades and being a good employee should be mitigating factors. Isn't that what everyone is supposed to do?
Going to school would also include graduating IMO and she was fired from Universal so........lol!!
 
  • #662
Another sidebar. Time to take the dancing puppies out.
 
  • #663
Welcome Tricksy! We're glad to have you. :)

It's supposed to start on Tuesday. But at the slow rate this jury selection is taking, it may not.

Thanks :)

I thought it was supposed to be Tuesday, but, like you say at the rate its going, I'd be very, very suprised.
 
  • #664
I haven't turned on In Session yet....is rosalie AKA (not allowed to say) there?
 
  • #665
But if these terms are defined clearly, perhaps he could grasp the concepts. AF is confusing him.

I agree
 
  • #666
I really think HJBP should just do all the questioning.
 
  • #667
I think they forced him to answer yes.

I think they got him to remove the "in this particular case" concept and apply it in general.

In this particular case, I bet he will stick with NO.
 
  • #668
sidebar

Ashton is about to throw a gasket

I think because AF continues to make her questions case specific by referring to "Miss Anthony"
 
  • #669
Then they need to define "summarize or summary" for JB and AF. ;)
 
  • #670
I don't think going to school, getting good or decent grades and being a good employee should be mitigating factors. Isn't that what everyone is supposed to do?

#1 - she dropped out of high school without graduating when she was one credit away from graduating
#2 - she was not a good student - maybe a mediocre student
#3 - she was not a good employee - that would require having a job.
 
  • #671
Not to confuse anyone...but we have 0 on the jury so far. We have 5 (I think..) called back for the next round, but both sides can still use their strikes, and they have to pass another round of questioning, I'm pretty sure. So, we still have 0 jurors officially sat.
 
  • #672
I hope the side bars are included in the time limit!
 
  • #673
WHY is AF talking to this guy like he's stupid?????
:banghead::banghead::banghead:

Because she's more lawyer than human.

(No offense whatsoever to the many, many very human lawyers out there - several of whom participate on WS).
 
  • #674
The issue continues to be AF reads this list of character and 'life issues' mitigating factors the DO directly pertain to this specific case and are NOT general and everyone who goes up as a PJ knows it and cannot divorce themselves from that thought.

The rules that HHJP read from are MUCH more general than what AF is reading and HHJP is giving ALOT of latitude here to avoid appeal

MOO
 
  • #675
I haven't turned on In Session yet....is rosalie AKA "lady in red" or DRG (death-row-groupie) there?

Yes, she is in the courtroom
 
  • #676
  • #677
  • #678
PLEASE do not post any "GENERIC" names with regards to "officers of the court", as well as for the attorneys, OR their staff. etc.

Self editing does wonders for the thread!

Thank you.

Bumping Up!
 
  • #679
AF forgot where they were so she's starting it over. NOOOOOOOO. We were almost done! :(
 
  • #680
oh no AF is gonna start from the beginning...UGH
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
61
Guests online
1,229
Total visitors
1,290

Forum statistics

Threads
632,330
Messages
18,624,808
Members
243,092
Latest member
senyazv
Back
Top