2011.05.20 Jury Selection DAY ELEVEN (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #561
(Husbands! :shakehead: )

HHJP: also as you know there is a standard rule that covers the attorneys from facial expressions. The constitution provides that victims of crimes be present, the sequestering is to keep out...the Anthonys have been reported many times giving public statements. The defense has not met their burden to show what prejuice they would suffer if the Anthonys were excluded from the rule. If the rule is invoked they will not be excluded if they violate other rules they will be excluded.

HHJP: they would not be excluded from being in the gallery during the trial.

JB: a discovery issue.

HHJP: okay..

JB: prior to the frye hearings I turned over to JA stuff from Dr. Vass. I made a statement in open court that we would not be using that and I returned them to him. In light of Dr. Vass testifying we (need it back) Mr. A had a objection to that. I am looking for guidance from the court, what does the court need from me if we need the info contained, I would like to comply with that.

JA: it was a CD containing doc it was a professional curtesy, he is supposed to file, that is the proper course, find which of those he wants, raise that issue when the time comes.

HHJP: did you give him copies of five thousand doc?

JB: yes, we can't know what Dr. Vass will say. His work, articles he has written...nothing that..

HHJP: as long as they turn the docs over, they don't have to tell you what parts they are going to use.

JA: had they given it to me back then...articles by dr. Vass when they come up, I didn't want mr. Baez to think this wasn't an issue. Oak Ridge...

HHJP: impeachment on collateral matters...

JA: I wouldn't impeach dr vass statements...

JA: someone received a sopena, they called to be put on stand by, (office) that wasn't possible, people who have to have sopenas...

The attorneys are not using their mics.

JB: rather than have the court and the tax payers wait around...that way we are ready to go...

MG: show up and call, mr baez which is showing up at nine...other wise we are going to be here because that is what the sopena says...it says "show up at nine oclock"

HHJP: anything on the sopena that has a number to call. Did you ask who said to not worry about it. Folks I have more important things to do besides that, if they don't want to call and they don't ask who they were talking to so they have a name, I talked to "" in Mr. Baez office...if they don't show up you all are lawyers you have to hold them in contempt. If they call the number and that person said that how can I hold them in willful contempt?

HHJP: anything? See you 8:30 monday morning.
 
  • #562
Oooops...didn't even get the gin in the cup. Guess I need to wait.
 
  • #563
  • #564
Nancy Grace said Casey's new look (pale with long hair) resembles a snake charmer.
Now ask a man what he thinks of Nancy Grace's "look".
 
  • #565
Sounds like a young woman on the stand... Could be wrong.
 
  • #566
#3268. Any info on her? TIA!
 
  • #567
Did we keep the last PJ guy ?
 
  • #568
Woot woot.....female up people! Keep our fingers crossed!

moo
 
  • #569
3268-no kids
 
  • #570
Well geez . . . first day of no school . . . I promised my kids biscuits & gravy. Now I have to run to the store . . . see you all in, oh, 50 pages :crazy:

:seeya:
 
  • #571
  • #572
Female PJ up. She heard about this case. She heard about it Monday before jury duty. She looked on Bay News Nine and saw a time line of facts.
 
  • #573
She sounds really young! I can't imagine my adult daughter sitting on this jury. It is going to change these people's lives - and not for the best, no matter what the outcome is.
 
  • #574
Baywatch 9
 
  • #575
She was out of the country in 08'
 
  • #576
Military spouse?
 
  • #577
Nancy Grace said Casey's new look (pale with long hair) resembles a snake charmer.

:floorlaugh: Tot Mom, the snake charmer
 
  • #578
ICA doesn't even have the class to stop whispering when the Judge starts speaking to the court. So disrespectful.

I agree! And she's not the only one. I noticed yesterday that AF continued to do whatever she was doing with her cell phone when the Judge came to the bench. Total disrespect for the Judge and the Court.
 
  • #579
ICA must be medicated because she hasn't had her angry tantrums........I was so sure we would see her crack and go ballistic. JMOO
 
  • #580
(Husbands! :shakehead: )

HHJP: also as you know there is a standard rule that covers the attorneys from facial expressions. The constitution provides that victims of crimes be present, the sequestering is to keep out...the Anthonys have been reported many times giving public statements. The defense has not met their burden to show what prejuice they would suffer if the Anthonys were excluded from the rule. If the rule is invoked they will not be excluded if they violate other rules they will be excluded.

HHJP: they would not be excluded from being in the gallery during the trial.

JB: a discovery issue.

HHJP: okay..

JB: prior to the frye hearings I turned over to JA stuff from Dr. Vass. I made a statement in open court that we would not be using that and I returned them to him. In light of Dr. Vass testifying we (need it back) Mr. A had a objection to that. I am looking for guidance from the court, what does the court need from me if we need the info contained, I would like to comply with that.

JA: it was a CD containing doc it was a professional curtesy, he is supposed to file, that is the proper course, find which of those he wants, raise that issue when the time comes.

HHJP: did you give him copies of five thousand doc?

JB: yes, we can't know what Dr. Vass will say. His work, articles he has written...nothing that..

HHJP: as long as they turn the docs over, they don't have to tell you what parts they are going to use.

JA: had they given it to me back then...articles by dr. Vass when they come up, I didn't want mr. Baez to think this wasn't an issue. Oak Ridge...

HHJP: impeachment on collateral matters...

JA: I wouldn't impeach dr vass statements...

JA: someone received a sopena, they called to be put on stand by, (office) that wasn't possible, people who have to have sopenas...

The attorneys are not using their mics.

JB: rather than have the court and the tax payers wait around...that way we are ready to go...

MG: show up and call, mr baez which is showing up at nine...other wise we are going to be here because that is what the sopena says...it says "show up at nine oclock"

HHJP: anything on the sopena that has a number to call. Did you ask who said to not worry about it. Folks I have more important things to do besides that, if they don't want to call and they don't ask who they were talking to so they have a name, I talked to "" in Mr. Baez office...if they don't show up you all are lawyers you have to hold them in contempt. If they call the number and that person said that how can I hold them in willful contempt?

HHJP: anything? See you 8:30 monday morning.

I am so lost. What did I just type out? I was on the youtube link, after being off because of (HIM). Is it still going? What am I doing? :crazy:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
3,737
Total visitors
3,802

Forum statistics

Threads
632,956
Messages
18,634,060
Members
243,357
Latest member
Https_ankh
Back
Top