margE
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction score
- 0
:maddening:
Snippet from http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20521892,00.html
"We did our first vote and it came out half to acquit, half to convict," says the juror. "And we talked about it for a while, going through the evidence. I'd say that some people got intense, but there were no personal attacks, no real yelling. And we talked for a while, then it was 11-1 to acquit. And the guy who didn't want to acquit basically looked at us and said, 'O.K., whatever you all want.' He knew he wasn't going to convince us."
RBM: WTH ? There HAD to be some "strong-arming" while deliberating ... MOO ...
I mean really -- "WHATEVER YOU ALL WANT" ? WHY OH WHY DIDN'T THIS JUROR STAND UP FOR WHAT HE BELIEVED IN ?
Keep Talking, Jurors ... eventually we WILL know WHAT REALLY HAPPENED during deliberations !
MOO MOO MOO ...
When I read the article, this part stood out and slapped me right in the face. The more the jurors talk, the worse they sound. :banghead: